[aarch64-port-dev ] Webrev of Oracle ARM & AARCH64 Sources
andrey.petushkov at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 10:13:47 UTC 2016
Pardon, I’m too puzzled by your statement. To my best knowledge no one from Azul considers this port as immature and wishes to drop it. Nor AFAIK anyone from Azul has expressed that on the maillist. In addition, aarch32 port shares much in common with RH’s aarch64 implementation so well, if you keep aarch64 in main openjdk repos it’s much easier to merge aarch32 into it, rather than merge with Sun/Oracle’s arm implementation. And yes, aarch32 is missing c2 port, but this should not make any difference long-term, right?
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 11:50, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28/09/16 20:22, Kostya Zolotnikov wrote:
>> Not sure who told You about Azul's view.
>> For us it is not that clear what make sense for You.
> I'm not quite sure what you mean by this, but I can only go by what
> Azul representatives have posted here. If I've got anything wrong,
> I am happy to be corrected.
More information about the aarch32-port-dev