Proposing projects for OpenJDK

Mario Torre neugens.limasoftware at
Tue Feb 25 07:34:59 PST 2014

2014-02-25 16:22 GMT+01:00 dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at>:
> On 12.02.2014 12:06, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 14:49 +0000, Richard Warburton wrote:
>>> I can see jitwatch having value in being part of openjdk itself, since it
>>> is directly related to openjdk.
>> Resending with the correct email :)
>> I would be great to have JitWatch in OpenJDK, but I don't know if this
>> is really possible, since it's based on JavaFX, which is not part of the
>> core API and not distributed with OpenJDK, only with proprietary JDK.
> OpenJFX is an OpenJDK Project, so I don't think that would necessarily be an
> issue.

Having JitWatch as an OpenJDK project, definitely no issues, but
having JitWatch being part of OpenJDK (that is, distributed like jhat,
for instance, which was I think what we were discussing), then yes,
because it would require an external component that is not part of
core the API.


pgp key: PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Blog: - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer:
Read About us at:

Please, support open standards:

More information about the adoption-discuss mailing list