break seen as a C archaism
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Fri Mar 9 22:55:53 UTC 2018
Did you happen to calculate what percentage was _not_ the "default"
case? I would expect that to be a considerable fraction.
On 3/9/2018 5:49 PM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr
> <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
> When i asked what we should do instead, the answer is either:
> 1/ we should not allow block of codes in the expression switch
> but only expression
> 2/ that we should use the lambda syntax with return, even if the
> semantics is different from the lambda semantics.
> I do not like (1) because i think the expression switch will
> become useless
> In our (large) codebase, +Louis determined that, among switch
> statements that appear translatable to expression switch, 13.8% of
> them seem to require at least one multi-statement case.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the amber-spec-experts