<AWT Dev> [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces
Artem.Ananiev at Sun.COM
Fri Sep 19 02:24:53 PDT 2008
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2008/9/19 Artem Ananiev <Artem.Ananiev at sun.com>:
>> Hi, Roman,
>> I don't see you in the list of people who signed SCA. Your company - "aicas
>> GmbH" - only has two members "iproetel" and "rabbit78", which is probably
>> due to our SCA list is incomplete, but this should be checked first. Have
>> you signed SCA? If yes, please, let us take a day or two to resolve this
>> From the technical point of view you first need to synchronize your OpenJDK
>> workspace with AWT one, because we had a number of fixes there which are not
>> integrated into the master workspace yet.
>> Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>> Anyway, I'm fine with that patch. Approved.
>>> Cool. So should I commit and push this patch (minus the MComponentPeer
>>> thing) to the awt-gate? Or do I have to wait for another OK? Does my
>>> (SSH-level) permission to push to the Cacio-Repos also extend to the
>>> other gates automatically? Also, I probably need some guidance with the
>>> exact commit message.
> I believe rabbit78 is one of Roman's pseudonyms.
Oh, I see... Now I need to find out why his OpenJDK username (rkennke)
differs from SCA signature name rabbit78, and if this may be a problem.
More information about the awt-dev