<AWT Dev> [PATCH FOR APPROVAL]: Fix broken build on newer versions of X11 (libXext >= 1.1.0)
Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Tue Nov 3 13:12:21 PST 2009
2009/11/3 Phil Race <Phil.Race at sun.com>:
> awt_Graphics and XShm is more for 2D than AWT, but
> I'm not sure how much it matters for this small change.
It's called awt_Graphics hence the AWT list. I doubt the distinction
between 2d and awt classes is clear to anyone outside Sun.
> Attach the patch to a bugzilla report .. someone will
> need to generate a sun bug id too. Can you post a zip
> of the webvrev somewhere?
I'm aware we need a Sun bug ID; that's why I asked for one to be
allocated in the e-mail. I have commit rights so I don't need
mentoring; I just need a review and a bug ID so I can push the fix. I
don't see why you need all this other superfluous stuff, as it wasn't
needed for any of my other pushes to various repos.
Is the patch ok? If so, could you please allocate it a bug ID.
> And is there an X11 reference you can cite to this apparent
> source incompatible change there?
but I avoided posting this in the original mail because it seems to
have changed again between that commit and the final release,
presumably due to compatibility issues (XShm.h is back and it's now
shmproto.h as seen in the patch). I've built the repo with this patch
here with the old version, and others have built it with the new
version; it does work for both. The same patch is already in Gentoo's
ebuild and IcedTea, and a similar patch has been used for the Fedora
rawhide RPMs for some time. It would be good to get it upstream as
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> With the new version of X11 (specifically libXext >= 1.1), the XShm.h
>> header has been refactored.
>> As a result, the build fails on awt_GraphicsEnv.c. This simple patch:
>> fixes the issue, without affecting older versions. It's trivial, but
>> very important; this new X11 is already in Gentoo, it'll be in F12
>> (where we first discovered this issue), and it's no doubt heading to
>> an Ubuntu near you soon.
>> The patch was contributed by Diego Pettenò <flameeyes at gmail.com>, who
>> I'm informed has signed the SCA.
>> Does this look ok? If so, can I have a bug ID to push this to the
>> awt-gate (or wherever is appropriate)?
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the awt-dev