johnyeary at gmail.com
Fri Oct 22 11:42:34 PDT 2010
That has been my limit too. I am limited on time, and I update the documents
on the builds as I have time, but two nights ago I tried to a build for PPC
with the latest code and "BOOM". So I gave up for the evening and have not
I think the first thing we need is a consistent build script that will build
without any general hassle. Setting up a build.sh to run without issues is
key. I have found on PPC that it is really unreliable. On Intel x86/x64 it
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tony Piselli <tpisellijr at mac.com> wrote:
> I've got a Dual processor G4 with lots of hard drive space that could be
> used for PPC work for 10.5. It's been over a decade since I've done serious
> c/c++ programming let alone dealt with Make files. A while ago I tried to do
> a build but got frustrated and ran out of time to get back into it.
> I may be able to help a couple of hours a week at most.
> Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:27 PM, "Lussier, Denis" <denisl at openscg.com> wrote:
> I too have had great luck using the old Soylatte build of OpenJDK 6. I
> understand that this can nicely be used as a bootstrap build for OpenJDK7.
> What I'm wondering is if anyone is willing (and capable) of getting it so
> that a miore current OpenJDK 6 can be built as a 32-bit Universal OSX binary
> so that Apple can't continue to punish owners of (perfectly good) older Macs
> by denying them access to JDK6.
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Sam Pullara < <spullara at gmail.com>
> spullara at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm hoping that now that Apple has officially decided to no longer
>> maintain the JVM that the community takes over. I've had good luck building
>> it from time to time using soylatte-1.0.3-32 as the base build JVM.
>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
>> I'm curious if anyone (besides myself) might be interested in helping to
>> bring up to current the OpenJDK6 OSX work.
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, John Rose < <john.r.rose at oracle.com>
>> john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I see that the BSD port has been integrated with b105 since 8/14.
>>> Meanwhile, JDK7 has now advanced to b115.
>>> Is there a problem holding up the integration of the new JDK7 changes?
>>> (Is there a project status page where I should be looking? The wiki
>>> looks too quiet.)
>>> -- John
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who
neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight
that knows not victory nor defeat."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bsd-port-dev