From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 1 08:40:55 2008 From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:40:55 -0800 Subject: Extending the pattern list in .hgignore to exclude webrev directories In-Reply-To: daniel.fuchs@sun.com; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:21:07 +0100; <47A31CC3.4040905@sun.com> Message-ID: <20080201164055.63164278A19@eggemoggin.niobe.net> > Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:21:07 +0100 > From: daniel.fuchs at sun.com > I'd like to suggest to extend .hgignore with these two lines: > > ^webrev/ > ^webrev_.*/ > > It would make it possible to keep several webrevs in your working > repository without polluting the output of 'hg status' > > Well, of course there's always the possibility to do > 'hg status | grep -v webrev' > if others in this group feel that it is not good idea ;-/ A better way to do this is to add the following to your ~/.hgrc: [ui] ignore = ~/.hgignore Then you can add whatever patterns you want to ~/.hgignore in order to suit your personal working style. - Mark From Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM Fri Feb 1 10:05:32 2008 From: Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:05:32 -0800 Subject: Extending the pattern list in .hgignore to exclude webrev directories In-Reply-To: <20080201164055.63164278A19@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20080201164055.63164278A19@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <47A35F6C.8020609@sun.com> Mark, Is this the recommended practice for the OpenJDK repositories? -- Jon Mark Reinhold wrote: >> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:21:07 +0100 >> From: daniel.fuchs at sun.com >> > > >> I'd like to suggest to extend .hgignore with these two lines: >> >> ^webrev/ >> ^webrev_.*/ >> >> It would make it possible to keep several webrevs in your working >> repository without polluting the output of 'hg status' >> >> Well, of course there's always the possibility to do >> 'hg status | grep -v webrev' >> if others in this group feel that it is not good idea ;-/ >> > > A better way to do this is to add the following to your ~/.hgrc: > > [ui] > ignore = ~/.hgignore > > Then you can add whatever patterns you want to ~/.hgignore in > order to suit your personal working style. > > - Mark > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080201/b186d02a/attachment.html From John.Rose at Sun.COM Fri Feb 1 14:52:28 2008 From: John.Rose at Sun.COM (John Rose) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:52:28 -0800 Subject: Extending the pattern list in .hgignore to exclude webrev directories In-Reply-To: <20080201164055.63164278A19@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20080201164055.63164278A19@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <40A31CCA-9FB5-481A-BB2E-8FBDD89BB6A8@sun.com> Please also check out (and refactor, steal, cross-link, or modify): http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunOnMac/MercurialTips -- John On Feb 1, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Mark Reinhold wrote: > A better way to do this is to add the following to your ~/.hgrc: > > [ui] > ignore = ~/.hgignore > > Then you can add whatever patterns you want to ~/.hgignore in > order to suit your personal working style. > > - Mark From ted at tedneward.com Sat Feb 2 18:59:40 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:59:40 -0800 Subject: Help with Windows build on b24 Message-ID: <002501c86610$d3f7a030$7be6e090$@com> I keep running into the same problem as I?ve emailed here before, so I?m appealing to whomever does the Windows debug/fastdebug builds at Sun: can you spare a few moments (I promise to try and keep it as lightweight and terse as possible) to help me diagnose the problem? I don?t want to file a bug over it, but I?m stumped as to what?s going on here. Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: 2/2/2008 1:50 PM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080202/f23719a1/attachment.html From philissler at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 18:30:41 2008 From: philissler at gmail.com (Phil Issler) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:30:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 Message-ID: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the following during the build of jdk: C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" -d "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" -Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/hpi.res c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' make[6]: *** No rule to make target `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/linker_md.obj', needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. Stop. make[6]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. Phil Issler -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-building-b24-on-Win32-tp15249930p15249930.html Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 01:15:05 2008 From: Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM (Max (Weijun) Wang) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:15:05 +0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 Message-ID: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> Hi All Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/ native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 101: syntax error before or at: limit "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/ native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/ native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 105: undefined symbol: limit cc: acomp failed for /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/ jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c gnumake[5]: *** [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/ max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/ sys_api_td.o] Error 2 gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gnumake[5]: Leaving directory `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/ work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' It seems that inside the file jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/ sys_api_td.c, there's a line 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) and the type rlim_t is not recognized. I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: #include #ifdef _KERNEL #include #endif #include #include #include #include #include While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in #ifdef. Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? Thanks Max From Alexey.Ushakov at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 02:45:08 2008 From: Alexey.Ushakov at Sun.COM (Alexey Ushakov) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:45:08 +0300 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> Message-ID: <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> Hello Max, Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- 55a56,59 > #if defined(__solaris__) > #include > #endif > Best Regards, Alexey Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: > Hi All > > Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: > > "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", > line 101: syntax error before or at: limit > "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", > line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit > "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", > line 105: undefined symbol: limit > cc: acomp failed for > /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c > > gnumake[5]: *** > [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] > Error 2 > gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > gnumake[5]: Leaving directory > `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' > > > It seems that inside the file > jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line > 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) > and the type rlim_t is not recognized. > > I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: > > #include > #ifdef _KERNEL > #include > #endif > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in > #ifdef. > > Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? > > Thanks > Max > From Martin.Buchholz at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 08:15:01 2008 From: Martin.Buchholz at Sun.COM (Martin Buchholz) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:15:01 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> Message-ID: <47A88B85.4000704@sun.com> Alexey Ushakov wrote: > Hello Max, > > Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team > responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment > though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use following > workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): > > ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- > 55a56,59 > > #if defined(__solaris__) > > #include > > #endif > > Any program that calls rlimit should include sys/resource.h, so the bug is definitely in sys_api_td.c. Strictly speaking, it's not a Solaris bug (it might even be considered a bug fix), although Solaris should not be gratuitously incompatible. The #include should be unconditional, since it's defined by the Unix 2004 standard. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getrlimit.html So simply #include Martin > Best Regards, > Alexey > > > Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >> >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 101: syntax error before or at: limit >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 105: undefined symbol: limit >> cc: acomp failed for >> /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >> >> gnumake[5]: *** >> [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] >> Error 2 >> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory >> `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >> >> >> It seems that inside the file >> jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >> >> I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: >> >> #include >> #ifdef _KERNEL >> #include >> #endif >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in >> #ifdef. >> >> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >> >> Thanks >> Max >> > From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 09:41:15 2008 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:41:15 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> Message-ID: <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> Alexey Ushakov wrote: > Hello Max, > > Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team > responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment > though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use following > workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): This is Bug-ID 6637583 Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? Kelly has built a fix that you could pull from his repository. HTH - Tim > ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- > 55a56,59 > > #if defined(__solaris__) > > #include > > #endif > > > > Best Regards, > Alexey > > > Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >> >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 101: syntax error before or at: limit >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit >> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >> line 105: undefined symbol: limit >> cc: acomp failed for >> /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >> >> gnumake[5]: *** >> [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] >> Error 2 >> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory >> `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >> >> >> It seems that inside the file >> jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >> >> I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: >> >> #include >> #ifdef _KERNEL >> #include >> #endif >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in >> #ifdef. >> >> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >> >> Thanks >> Max >> > From Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 17:22:43 2008 From: Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM (Max (Weijun) Wang) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:22:43 +0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> Message-ID: <2A9323FC-F77B-4C80-94C6-E3FC2F6BACD7@Sun.COM> The bug was identified 8 weeks ago? Anyway, this demonstrates that even us Sun employees don't have an internal code repository for latest code fixes. :'( Thanks all. Max On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > Alexey Ushakov wrote: >> Hello Max, >> Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team >> responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment >> though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use >> following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): > > This is Bug-ID 6637583 > Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? > > Kelly has built a fix that you could pull from his repository. > > HTH - Tim > > >> ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- >> 55a56,59 >> > #if defined(__solaris__) >> > #include >> > #endif >> > >> Best Regards, >> Alexey >> Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >>> Hi All >>> >>> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >>> >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/ >>> hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 101: syntax error >>> before or at: limit >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/ >>> hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 101: warning: >>> undefined or missing type for: limit >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/ >>> hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", line 105: undefined symbol: >>> limit >>> cc: acomp failed for /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/ >>> myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >>> gnumake[5]: *** [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/ >>> max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/ >>> sys_api_td.o] Error 2 >>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/ >>> max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >>> >>> It seems that inside the file jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/ >>> src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >>> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >>> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >>> >>> I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/ >>> stream.h: >>> >>> #include >>> #ifdef _KERNEL >>> #include >>> #endif >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> >>> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded >>> in #ifdef. >>> >>> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Max >>> > From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Tue Feb 5 17:41:17 2008 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:41:17 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <2A9323FC-F77B-4C80-94C6-E3FC2F6BACD7@Sun.COM> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> <2A9323FC-F77B-4C80-94C6-E3FC2F6BACD7@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <47A9103D.9090608@sun.com> Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: > The bug was identified 8 weeks ago? Yes. > Anyway, this demonstrates that even us Sun employees don't have an > internal code repository for latest code fixes. :'( Well - we do - I don't know offhand where Kelly's repo is, but I could dig it up in my email archive. I wish we didn't have the current state of affairs either. My only note as I head for the exit and start cooking dinner is that Solaris Express (also known as Solaris 11) is not an "official" build platform for JDK 7. We always want to be able to build on the very latest Solaris release (that is what I run, all the time, as much as possible), but the JDK7 Release Engineering builds are done on Solaris 10 Update 3 (I just checked), and those are not affected by 6637583. We will fix this as soon as we can. Tim > Thanks all. > Max > > On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > >> Alexey Ushakov wrote: >>> Hello Max, >>> Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team >>> responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment >>> though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use >>> following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): >> >> This is Bug-ID 6637583 >> Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 6 15:44:14 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:44:14 -0800 Subject: jdk7 build issue with GNU make 3.81 Message-ID: <47AA464E.9070909@sun.com> FYI... patch for bug 6638060 attached. The latest GNU make 3.81 has changed the way it deals with the SHELL env variable, brought out this issue in the makefiles. -kto -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: jdk7-6638060.changeset-export Url: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080206/3b28e668/jdk7-6638060.changeset-export From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 6 15:51:57 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:51:57 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> Message-ID: <47AA481D.8070200@sun.com> This is the change I did to JDK6 and the OpenJDK6 files. Granted it's been pointed out that maybe just doing this include on both Linux and Solaris should work, I wasn't sure about doing this include on Linux at the time I made the change. We use some pretty antique Linux systems for jdk5/jdk6 and the variations in the Linux systems seems pretty extreme, so I'm never quite sure what is safe to do that works for both our antique versions and the newer versions of Linux. :^( -kto --- old/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 15:08:55 2008 +++ new/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 15:08:55 2008 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.34 05/11/17 + * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.35 08/01/11 * * Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. * SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms. @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ */ #ifdef __linux__ typedef int rlim_t ; +#else +#include #endif Tim Bell wrote: > Alexey Ushakov wrote: >> Hello Max, >> >> Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team >> responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment >> though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use >> following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): > > This is Bug-ID 6637583 > Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? > > Kelly has built a fix that you could pull from his repository. > > HTH - Tim > > >> ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- >> 55a56,59 >> > #if defined(__solaris__) >> > #include >> > #endif >> > >> >> Best Regards, >> Alexey >> >> >> Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >>> Hi All >>> >>> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >>> >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>> line 101: syntax error before or at: limit >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>> line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit >>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>> line 105: undefined symbol: limit >>> cc: acomp failed for >>> /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >>> >>> gnumake[5]: *** >>> [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] >>> Error 2 >>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory >>> `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >>> >>> >>> It seems that inside the file >>> jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >>> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >>> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >>> >>> I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: >>> >>> #include >>> #ifdef _KERNEL >>> #include >>> #endif >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> >>> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in >>> #ifdef. >>> >>> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Max >>> >> > From Martin.Buchholz at Sun.COM Wed Feb 6 17:43:30 2008 From: Martin.Buchholz at Sun.COM (Martin Buchholz) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:43:30 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47AA481D.8070200@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> <47AA481D.8070200@sun.com> Message-ID: <47AA6242.2060307@sun.com> I agree that the more conservative fix you applied is perfect for legacy releases. For jdk7, we should forget about possible failure with antique Linux releases, especially given this could only ever affect developers. Martin Kelly O'Hair wrote: > This is the change I did to JDK6 and the OpenJDK6 files. > Granted it's been pointed out that maybe just doing this include > on both Linux and Solaris should work, I wasn't sure about > doing this include on Linux at the time I made the change. > > We use some pretty antique Linux systems for jdk5/jdk6 and the variations > in the Linux systems seems pretty extreme, so I'm never quite sure > what is safe to do that works for both our antique versions and the > newer versions of Linux. :^( > > -kto > > --- old/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 > 15:08:55 2008 > +++ new/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 > 15:08:55 2008 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > /* > - * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.34 05/11/17 > + * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.35 08/01/11 > * > * Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. > * SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms. > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ > */ > #ifdef __linux__ > typedef int rlim_t ; > +#else > +#include > #endif > > > > Tim Bell wrote: >> Alexey Ushakov wrote: >>> Hello Max, >>> >>> Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team >>> responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment >>> though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use >>> following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): >> >> This is Bug-ID 6637583 >> Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? >> >> Kelly has built a fix that you could pull from his repository. >> >> HTH - Tim >> >> >>> ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- >>> 55a56,59 >>> > #if defined(__solaris__) >>> > #include >>> > #endif >>> > >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Alexey >>> >>> >>> Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >>>> Hi All >>>> >>>> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >>>> >>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>> line 101: syntax error before or at: limit >>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>> line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit >>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>> line 105: undefined symbol: limit >>>> cc: acomp failed for >>>> /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >>>> >>>> gnumake[5]: *** >>>> [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] >>>> Error 2 >>>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory >>>> `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >>>> >>>> >>>> It seems that inside the file >>>> jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >>>> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >>>> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >>>> >>>> I do a little search and find out that in my /usr/include/sys/stream.h: >>>> >>>> #include >>>> #ifdef _KERNEL >>>> #include >>>> #endif >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> >>>> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded in >>>> #ifdef. >>>> >>>> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Max >>>> >>> >> From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 6 18:55:41 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:55:41 -0800 Subject: OpenJDK does not build on Solaris nv82 In-Reply-To: <47AA6242.2060307@sun.com> References: <42DABF4A-CBAC-4BA9-B15C-F6F625D71C0F@sun.com> <47A83E34.4010906@sun.com> <47A89FBB.3050306@sun.com> <47AA481D.8070200@sun.com> <47AA6242.2060307@sun.com> Message-ID: <47AA732D.7010209@sun.com> Agreed. With jdk7, it's time to clean house where we can and take the risk. -kto Martin Buchholz wrote: > I agree that the more conservative fix you applied is perfect for > legacy releases. > > For jdk7, we should forget about possible failure with antique Linux > releases, especially given this could only ever affect developers. > > Martin > > Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> This is the change I did to JDK6 and the OpenJDK6 files. >> Granted it's been pointed out that maybe just doing this include >> on both Linux and Solaris should work, I wasn't sure about >> doing this include on Linux at the time I made the change. >> >> We use some pretty antique Linux systems for jdk5/jdk6 and the variations >> in the Linux systems seems pretty extreme, so I'm never quite sure >> what is safe to do that works for both our antique versions and the >> newer versions of Linux. :^( >> >> -kto >> >> --- old/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 >> 15:08:55 2008 >> +++ new/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c Fri Jan 11 >> 15:08:55 2008 >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> /* >> - * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.34 05/11/17 >> + * @(#)sys_api_td.c 1.35 08/01/11 >> * >> * Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. >> * SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms. >> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ >> */ >> #ifdef __linux__ >> typedef int rlim_t ; >> +#else >> +#include >> #endif >> >> >> >> Tim Bell wrote: >>> Alexey Ushakov wrote: >>>> Hello Max, >>>> >>>> Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team >>>> responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment >>>> though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use >>>> following workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me): >>> >>> This is Bug-ID 6637583 >>> Build failure on latest Solaris, source missing include of resource.h? >>> >>> Kelly has built a fix that you could pull from his repository. >>> >>> HTH - Tim >>> >>> >>>> ------- src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c ------- >>>> 55a56,59 >>>> > #if defined(__solaris__) >>>> > #include >>>> > #endif >>>> > >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Alexey >>>> >>>> >>>> Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: >>>>> Hi All >>>>> >>>>> Just update my Solaris to nv82 and nightly build fails: >>>>> >>>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>>> line 101: syntax error before or at: limit >>>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>>> line 101: warning: undefined or missing type for: limit >>>>> "/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c", >>>>> line 105: undefined symbol: limit >>>>> cc: acomp failed for >>>>> /net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c >>>>> >>>>> gnumake[5]: *** >>>>> [/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/armory/java/re/max_huge/b7open/solaris-sparc/tmp/java/hpi/native_threads/obj/sys_api_td.o] >>>>> Error 2 >>>>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>>> gnumake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>>> gnumake[5]: Leaving directory >>>>> `/net/bounty.prc.sun.com/j2se-jsn/max/work/myjdk/jdk/make/java/hpi/native' >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It seems that inside the file >>>>> jdk/src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/sys_api_td.c, there's a line >>>>> 101: int InitializeIO(rlim_t limit) >>>>> and the type rlim_t is not recognized. >>>>> >>>>> I do a little search and find out that in my >>>>> /usr/include/sys/stream.h: >>>>> >>>>> #include >>>>> #ifdef _KERNEL >>>>> #include >>>>> #endif >>>>> #include >>>>> #include >>>>> #include >>>>> #include >>>>> #include >>>>> >>>>> While in the old versions, the sys/vnode.h line is not surrounded >>>>> in #ifdef. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone can pass this to a Solaris guy? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Max >>>>> >>>> >>> From ted at tedneward.com Fri Feb 8 02:40:50 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 02:40:50 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <04db01c86a3f$167b1c70$43715550$@com> Does anybody have any ideas on how to debug and/or fix this? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Phil Issler > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 6:31 PM > To: build-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > > I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > > corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the following > during the build of jdk: > > > C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" -d > "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > - > Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g > O/hpi.res > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning > RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > make[6]: *** No rule to make target > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO > /linker_md.obj', > needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. > Stop. > make[6]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[5]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > > Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > > Phil Issler > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-building- > b24-on-Win32-tp15249930p15249930.html > Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: > 2/2/2008 1:50 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1263 - Release Date: 2/6/2008 8:14 PM From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Fri Feb 8 11:33:10 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:33:10 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <04db01c86a3f$167b1c70$43715550$@com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <04db01c86a3f$167b1c70$43715550$@com> Message-ID: <47ACAE76.8090600@sun.com> Did you try adding COMPANY_NAME=CompanyTed to the gnumake command line? rc.exe does not like empty macro values. -kto Ted Neward wrote: > Does anybody have any ideas on how to debug and/or fix this? > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Phil Issler >> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 6:31 PM >> To: build-dev at openjdk.java.net >> Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 >> >> >> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. >> >> corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the following >> during the build of jdk: >> >> >> C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d >> "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" -d >> "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d >> "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d >> "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D >> "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" >> - >> Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g >> O/hpi.res >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning >> RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' >> make[6]: *** No rule to make target >> `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO >> /linker_md.obj', >> needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 >> /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. >> Stop. >> make[6]: Leaving directory >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' >> make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 >> make[5]: Leaving directory >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' >> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 >> make[4]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' >> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' >> make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' >> make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' >> make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 >> >> Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. >> >> Phil Issler >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-building- >> b24-on-Win32-tp15249930p15249930.html >> Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: >> 2/2/2008 1:50 PM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1263 - Release Date: 2/6/2008 > 8:14 PM > > From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Fri Feb 8 21:10:05 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:10:05 -0800 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages Message-ID: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> FYI... I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. -kto From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Sat Feb 9 15:56:42 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:56:42 +0000 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> Message-ID: <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > FYI... > > I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home > > It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. > > -kto > I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems seem to be slipping through the net? -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net From springer at reservoir.com Sun Feb 10 10:44:57 2008 From: springer at reservoir.com (Jonathan Springer) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:44:57 -0600 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> FYI... >> >> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: >> >> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home >> >> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. >> >> -kto > > I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report > about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first > tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) > didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from > Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems > seem to be slipping through the net? (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine. BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding some structure. The new top link is: http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/OpenJDK+Builds+Home+Page -- Jonathan Springer | Reservoir Labs, Inc. | http://www.reservoir.com/ From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Sun Feb 10 15:43:50 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:43:50 -0800 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> Message-ID: <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> That's for adding the report. Yes, I did a little re-organization, I'm a little unfamiliar with this particular wiki format and rules. I think anyone can edit and contribute pages to existing spaces, and I can (as BigAloha) add spaces relating to OpenJDK if people think a new one is warranted. -kto Jonathan Springer wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >>> FYI... >>> >>> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: >>> >>> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home >>> >>> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. >>> >>> -kto >> >> I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report >> about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first >> tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) >> didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from >> Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems >> seem to be slipping through the net? > > (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the > only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine. > > BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding > some structure. The new top link is: > http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/OpenJDK+Builds+Home+Page > From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Sun Feb 10 15:49:21 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:49:21 -0800 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> Message-ID: <47AF8D81.6050203@sun.com> Kelly O'Hair wrote: > That's for adding the report. ^^^^^ Thanks .... was what I meant to type. Clumsy fingers. ;^) -kto > > Yes, I did a little re-organization, I'm a little unfamiliar > with this particular wiki format and rules. > > I think anyone can edit and contribute pages to existing > spaces, and I can (as BigAloha) add spaces relating to > OpenJDK if people think a new one is warranted. > > -kto > > Jonathan Springer wrote: >> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >>>> FYI... >>>> >>>> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: >>>> >>>> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home >>>> >>>> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. >>>> >>>> -kto >>> >>> I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report >>> about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first >>> tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) >>> didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from >>> Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems >>> seem to be slipping through the net? >> >> (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the >> only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine. >> >> BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding >> some structure. The new top link is: >> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/OpenJDK+Builds+Home+Page >> From ted at tedneward.com Sun Feb 10 18:30:51 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:30:51 -0800 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> Message-ID: <035901c86c56$216bcf80$64436e80$@com> Kelly-- Would you (and the others on this list can jump in here with opinions) prefer the Windows build stuff I blogged to go onto the wiki? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 3:44 PM > To: Jonathan Springer > Cc: build-dev > Subject: Re: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages > > That's for adding the report. > > Yes, I did a little re-organization, I'm a little unfamiliar > with this particular wiki format and rules. > > I think anyone can edit and contribute pages to existing > spaces, and I can (as BigAloha) add spaces relating to > OpenJDK if people think a new one is warranted. > > -kto > > Jonathan Springer wrote: > > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > >> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > >>> FYI... > >>> > >>> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: > >>> > >>> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home > >>> > >>> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. > >>> > >>> -kto > >> > >> I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report > >> about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first > >> tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) > >> didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from > >> Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems > >> seem to be slipping through the net? > > > > (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the > > only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine. > > > > BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding > > some structure. The new top link is: > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/OpenJDK+Builds+Home+Page > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: > 2/10/2008 12:21 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: 2/10/2008 12:21 PM From Jean-Christophe.Collet at Sun.COM Mon Feb 11 02:30:10 2008 From: Jean-Christophe.Collet at Sun.COM (Jean-Christophe Collet) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:30:10 +0100 Subject: webrev tool for openJDK available Message-ID: <47B023B2.8030905@sun.com> It took a bit longer than I expected, but I finally got a stable enough version of webrev (the tool we use for publishing code reviews) on my blog. I also put a bit of explanation as well as a rough documentation. You'll find all that at http://blogs.sun.com/jcc/ Cheers, From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Mon Feb 11 12:00:53 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:00:53 -0800 Subject: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages In-Reply-To: <035901c86c56$216bcf80$64436e80$@com> References: <47AD35AD.4080607@sun.com> <17c6771e0802091556p69b21e18u7a2489f5c6cae3cd@mail.gmail.com> <47AF4629.1080308@reservoir.com> <47AF8C36.2000309@sun.com> <035901c86c56$216bcf80$64436e80$@com> Message-ID: <47B0A975.4090205@sun.com> I'm thinking that is it makes sense for others to contribute, edit, or correct the pages, then a wiki makes sense. Just my opinion. I was thinking that some of my blogs in the past might make sense to be added to this wiki, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to do that. Anyone is welcome to post whatever pages they want. Not that I'm crazy about this particular wiki system. Seems rather complicated to me, but it's there and it works, sort of. Adding the glossary was not easy. -kto Ted Neward wrote: > Kelly-- > > Would you (and the others on this list can jump in here with opinions) prefer the Windows build stuff I blogged to go onto the wiki? > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 3:44 PM >> To: Jonathan Springer >> Cc: build-dev >> Subject: Re: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages >> >> That's for adding the report. >> >> Yes, I did a little re-organization, I'm a little unfamiliar >> with this particular wiki format and rules. >> >> I think anyone can edit and contribute pages to existing >> spaces, and I can (as BigAloha) add spaces relating to >> OpenJDK if people think a new one is warranted. >> >> -kto >> >> Jonathan Springer wrote: >>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >>>>> FYI... >>>>> >>>>> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at: >>>>> >>>>> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home >>>>> >>>>> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them. >>>>> >>>>> -kto >>>> I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report >>>> about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first >>>> tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think) >>>> didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from >>>> Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems >>>> seem to be slipping through the net? >>> (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the >>> only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine. >>> >>> BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding >>> some structure. The new top link is: >>> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/OpenJDK+Builds+Home+Page >>> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: >> 2/10/2008 12:21 PM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: 2/10/2008 12:21 PM > > From ted at tedneward.com Wed Feb 20 05:00:02 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:00:02 -0800 Subject: New question: new build? Message-ID: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> When can we expect to see a b25 or b26 drop? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: 2/19/2008 10:55 AM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080220/9ee2b304/attachment.html From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 20 09:07:24 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:07:24 -0800 Subject: New question: new build? In-Reply-To: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> References: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> Message-ID: <47BC5E4C.5070301@sun.com> Once the repositories open up it may take a week or two for the changes to propagate from the team areas to the master area. At that point the release engineering team will probably create some kind of schedule for the builds going forward, historically 1 or 2 weeks apart, but sometimes it's based on the availability of testing resources. And they may have their hands full with dealing with the OpenJDK6 work right now, which makes predictions very difficult. -kto Ted Neward wrote: > When can we expect to see a b25 or b26 drop? > > > > Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: > 2/19/2008 10:55 AM > From ted at tedneward.com Wed Feb 20 18:40:17 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:40:17 -0800 Subject: New question: new build? In-Reply-To: <47BC5E4C.5070301@sun.com> References: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> <47BC5E4C.5070301@sun.com> Message-ID: <03b101c87433$19ae3320$4d0a9960$@com> This isn't a criticism aimed at you, Kelly, but that last statement sounds pretty ominous--is there any forward work on JDK7 taking place at all? Why the prioritization of OpenJDK6 over JDK 7? Or is that a mischaracterization/misread on my part? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:07 AM > To: Ted Neward > Cc: 'build-dev' > Subject: Re: New question: new build? > > Once the repositories open up it may take a week or two for the > changes to propagate from the team areas to the master area. > At that point the release engineering team will probably create > some kind of schedule for the builds going forward, historically > 1 or 2 weeks apart, but sometimes it's based on the availability > of testing resources. And they may have their hands full with > dealing with the OpenJDK6 work right now, which makes predictions > very difficult. > > -kto > > Ted Neward wrote: > > When can we expect to see a b25 or b26 drop? > > > > > > > > Ted Neward > > > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: > > 2/19/2008 10:55 AM > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: > 2/19/2008 10:55 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: 2/20/2008 10:26 AM From Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM Wed Feb 20 18:59:04 2008 From: Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM (Brad Wetmore) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:59:04 -0800 Subject: New question: new build? In-Reply-To: <03b101c87433$19ae3320$4d0a9960$@com> References: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> <47BC5E4C.5070301@sun.com> <03b101c87433$19ae3320$4d0a9960$@com> Message-ID: <47BCE8F8.7060008@sun.com> It depends on who you ask (and when). Folks like myself are focused primarily on JDK7, folks like Joe Darcy are mainly on JDK6, and folks like Kelly are a mix. Brad Ted Neward wrote: > This isn't a criticism aimed at you, Kelly, but that last statement sounds > pretty ominous--is there any forward work on JDK7 taking place at all? Why > the prioritization of OpenJDK6 over JDK 7? Or is that a > mischaracterization/misread on my part? > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:07 AM >> To: Ted Neward >> Cc: 'build-dev' >> Subject: Re: New question: new build? >> >> Once the repositories open up it may take a week or two for the >> changes to propagate from the team areas to the master area. >> At that point the release engineering team will probably create >> some kind of schedule for the builds going forward, historically >> 1 or 2 weeks apart, but sometimes it's based on the availability >> of testing resources. And they may have their hands full with >> dealing with the OpenJDK6 work right now, which makes predictions >> very difficult. >> >> -kto >> >> Ted Neward wrote: >>> When can we expect to see a b25 or b26 drop? >>> >>> >>> >>> Ted Neward >>> >>> Java, .NET, XML Services >>> >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>> >>> http://www.tedneward.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: >>> 2/19/2008 10:55 AM >>> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: >> 2/19/2008 10:55 AM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: 2/20/2008 > 10:26 AM > > From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 20 20:13:08 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:13:08 -0800 Subject: New question: new build? In-Reply-To: <03b101c87433$19ae3320$4d0a9960$@com> References: <024001c873c0$841ac0c0$8c504240$@com> <47BC5E4C.5070301@sun.com> <03b101c87433$19ae3320$4d0a9960$@com> Message-ID: <47BCFA54.4040400@sun.com> There has been accumulated work on jdk7 and on going work, didn't mean to imply otherwise. But some of the infrastructure teams like the release engineering team (and to some degree me) need to juggle our time between the jdk7, openjdk6, and various update releases. Not everyone has to juggle like this, there are teams working mostly on jdk7 work. Openjdk6 has an immediate schedule we need to meet, and it's very likely that anything done to Openjdk6 to 'open' it up will transfer to openjdk7 too, so there is likely some benefits to openjdk7 here. -kto Ted Neward wrote: > This isn't a criticism aimed at you, Kelly, but that last statement sounds > pretty ominous--is there any forward work on JDK7 taking place at all? Why > the prioritization of OpenJDK6 over JDK 7? Or is that a > mischaracterization/misread on my part? > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:07 AM >> To: Ted Neward >> Cc: 'build-dev' >> Subject: Re: New question: new build? >> >> Once the repositories open up it may take a week or two for the >> changes to propagate from the team areas to the master area. >> At that point the release engineering team will probably create >> some kind of schedule for the builds going forward, historically >> 1 or 2 weeks apart, but sometimes it's based on the availability >> of testing resources. And they may have their hands full with >> dealing with the OpenJDK6 work right now, which makes predictions >> very difficult. >> >> -kto >> >> Ted Neward wrote: >>> When can we expect to see a b25 or b26 drop? >>> >>> >>> >>> Ted Neward >>> >>> Java, .NET, XML Services >>> >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>> >>> http://www.tedneward.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: >>> 2/19/2008 10:55 AM >>> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1287 - Release Date: >> 2/19/2008 10:55 AM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: 2/20/2008 > 10:26 AM > > From ted at tedneward.com Wed Feb 20 21:02:31 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:02:31 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <47ACAE76.8090600@sun.com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <04db01c86a3f$167b1c70$43715550$@com> <47ACAE76.8090600@sun.com> Message-ID: <03fd01c87446$f86c02a0$e94407e0$@com> Interesting follow-up on this: If I go into jdk/make, and do a "make OPENJDK=true fastdebug debug", everything builds fine. It's only from the top-level Makefile that the problem appears, it looks like. Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:33 AM > To: Ted Neward > Cc: 'Phil Issler'; build-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > Did you try adding COMPANY_NAME=CompanyTed to the gnumake command line? > > rc.exe does not like empty macro values. > > -kto > > > Ted Neward wrote: > > Does anybody have any ideas on how to debug and/or fix this? > > > > Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Phil Issler > >> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 6:31 PM > >> To: build-dev at openjdk.java.net > >> Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 > >> > >> > >> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > >> > >> corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the > following > >> during the build of jdk: > >> > >> > >> C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > >> "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" > -d > >> "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > >> "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > >> "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > >> "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D > "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > >> - > >> > Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g > >> O/hpi.res > >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : > warning > >> RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > >> make[6]: *** No rule to make target > >> > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO > >> /linker_md.obj', > >> needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > >> > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. > >> Stop. > >> make[6]: Leaving directory > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > >> make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > >> make[5]: Leaving directory > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > >> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > >> make[4]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > >> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > >> make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > >> make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > >> make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > >> > >> Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > >> > >> Phil Issler > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem- > building- > >> b24-on-Win32-tp15249930p15249930.html > >> Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at > >> Nabble.com. > >> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: > >> 2/2/2008 1:50 PM > >> > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1263 - Release Date: > 2/6/2008 > > 8:14 PM > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1266 - Release Date: > 2/8/2008 10:06 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: 2/20/2008 10:26 AM From ted at tedneward.com Thu Feb 21 10:52:38 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:52:38 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <03fd01c87446$f86c02a0$e94407e0$@com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <04db01c86a3f$167b1c70$43715550$@com> <47ACAE76.8090600@sun.com> <03fd01c87446$f86c02a0$e94407e0$@com> Message-ID: <058701c874ba$efcf2bd0$cf6d8370$@com> Also, it *really* looks like there's some kind of disconnect between invoking the top-level make (in the jdk7 directory) and what gets invoked to the child makefiles; for example, look at this invocation of make in the jdk7/jdk directory when I invoke make from the jdk7 directory with "ALT_OUTPUTDIR=C:/Prg/OpenJDK/output" set: make sanity all images JDK_TOPDIR=c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk JDK_MAKE_SHARED_DIR=c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/common/shared EXTERNALSANITYCONTROL=true TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=5 MILESTONE=internal BUILD_NUMBER=b00 JDK_BUILD_NUMBER=b00 FULL_VERSION=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Ted_21_feb_2008_10_27-b00 PREVIOUS_JDK_VERSION=1.6.0 JDK_VERSION=1.7.0 JDK_MKTG_VERSION=7 JDK_MAJOR_VERSION=1 JDK_MINOR_VERSION=7 JDK_MICRO_VERSION=0 ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 VARIANT=DBG FASTDEBUG=true DEBUG_CLASSFILES=true COOKED_BUILD_NUMBER=0 ANT_HOME="c:/Prg/apache-ant-1.7.0" FINDBUGS_HOME="C:/Prg/findbugs-1.2.1" ALT_OUTPUTDIR=c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2 BUILD_HOTSPOT=false Notice that ALT_OUTPUTDIR isn't set even close to what it should be, from what I can tell. In about two weeks I'm going to start standing up in front of audiences and tell them about how to hack on the JDK in general and on the OpenJDK sources in particular, and I'd *really* like to have the build working on Windows end-to-end. I can build the jdk subtree by going into that directory by hand and kicking off a make (see below), but I don't know what I'm missing by doing so, and certainly I don't get the warm-n-fuzzy feeling of having it done from the top-level makefile. If somebody at Sun who's responsible for building the Windows product and debug/fastdebug builds can just take a few minutes to either confirm or deny this behavior on their machine and maybe spend a few minutes in email conversation with me on this, I'd *really* appreciate it, particularly since the next release drop isn't going to be out for a while. Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Ted Neward > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:03 PM > To: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM > Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net; 'Phil Issler' > Subject: RE: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > Interesting follow-up on this: > > If I go into jdk/make, and do a "make OPENJDK=true fastdebug debug", > everything builds fine. It's only from the top-level Makefile that the > problem appears, it looks like. > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] > > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:33 AM > > To: Ted Neward > > Cc: 'Phil Issler'; build-dev at openjdk.java.net > > Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > > > Did you try adding COMPANY_NAME=CompanyTed to the gnumake command > line? > > > > rc.exe does not like empty macro values. > > > > -kto > > > > > > Ted Neward wrote: > > > Does anybody have any ideas on how to debug and/or fix this? > > > > > > Ted Neward > > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > > >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Phil Issler > > >> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 6:31 PM > > >> To: build-dev at openjdk.java.net > > >> Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > > >> > > >> corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the > > following > > >> during the build of jdk: > > >> > > >> > > >> C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > > >> "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31- > b00" > > -d > > >> "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > > >> "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > > >> "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > > >> "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D > > "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > > >> - > > >> > > > Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g > > >> O/hpi.res > > >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > > >> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : > > warning > > >> RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > > >> make[6]: *** No rule to make target > > >> > > > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO > > >> /linker_md.obj', > > >> needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > > >> > > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. > > >> Stop. > > >> make[6]: Leaving directory > > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > > >> make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > > >> make[5]: Leaving directory > > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > > >> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > > >> make[4]: Leaving directory > > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > > >> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > > >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > > >> make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > > >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > > >> make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > > >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > > >> make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > > >> > > >> Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > > >> > > >> Phil Issler > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem- > > building- > > >> b24-on-Win32-tp15249930p15249930.html > > >> Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at > > >> Nabble.com. > > >> > > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: > > >> 2/2/2008 1:50 PM > > >> > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1263 - Release Date: > > 2/6/2008 > > > 8:14 PM > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1266 - Release Date: > > 2/8/2008 10:06 AM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: > 2/20/2008 > 10:26 AM > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.8/1289 - Release Date: > 2/20/2008 10:26 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1291 - Release Date: 2/21/2008 11:05 AM From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 27 11:43:57 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:43:57 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <47C5BD7D.1070202@sun.com> I (and others) have been able to reproduce this on our own, but I'm still not sure what the problem is. Suspects are: * GNU make VPATH issue (in the makefiles or make itself) * C:/ vs. /cygdrive/c path issue * buggy find.exe? (Not sure why this would cause this problem) * something related to OUTPUTDIR and the short paths Just so people know, it is being investigated, just proving tricky to isolate. -kto Phil Issler wrote: > I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > > corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the following > during the build of jdk: > > > C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" -d > "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > -Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/hpi.res > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning > RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > make[6]: *** No rule to make target > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/linker_md.obj', > needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. Stop. > make[6]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[5]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > > Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > > Phil Issler From ted at tedneward.com Wed Feb 27 13:37:36 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:37:36 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <47C5BD7D.1070202@sun.com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <47C5BD7D.1070202@sun.com> Message-ID: <064e01c87988$fb79dd40$f26d97c0$@com> If there's any tests I can run here to help track this down, let me know.... Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:44 AM > To: Phil Issler > Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > I (and others) have been able to reproduce this on our own, but > I'm still not sure what the problem is. > > Suspects are: > * GNU make VPATH issue (in the makefiles or make itself) > * C:/ vs. /cygdrive/c path issue > * buggy find.exe? (Not sure why this would cause this problem) > * something related to OUTPUTDIR and the short paths > > Just so people know, it is being investigated, just proving tricky > to isolate. > > -kto > > Phil Issler wrote: > > I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > > > > corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the > following > > during the build of jdk: > > > > > > C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > > "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" - > d > > "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > > "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > > "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > > "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > > - > Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g > O/hpi.res > > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning > > RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > > make[6]: *** No rule to make target > > > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO > /linker_md.obj', > > needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. > Stop. > > make[6]: Leaving directory > > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > > make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > > make[5]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > > make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > > make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > > make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > > make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > > make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > > > > Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > > > > Phil Issler > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: > 2/27/2008 4:34 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: 2/27/2008 4:34 PM From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Feb 27 14:15:01 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:15:01 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <064e01c87988$fb79dd40$f26d97c0$@com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <47C5BD7D.1070202@sun.com> <064e01c87988$fb79dd40$f26d97c0$@com> Message-ID: <47C5E0E5.4040003@sun.com> I'm trying this fix in the top level repository: bonsai<315> hg diff diff --git a/make/Defs-internal.gmk b/make/Defs-internal.gmk --- a/make/Defs-internal.gmk +++ b/make/Defs-internal.gmk @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ endif # Common make arguments (supplied to all component builds) COMMON_BUILD_ARGUMENTS = \ - JDK_TOPDIR=$(ABS_JDK_TOPDIR) \ JDK_MAKE_SHARED_DIR=$(ABS_JDK_TOPDIR)/make/common/shared \ EXTERNALSANITYCONTROL=true \ TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=$(TARGET_CLASS_VERSION) \ Just delete that one line. My builds haven't finished yet so I don't know for sure this fixes the problem. -kto Ted Neward wrote: > If there's any tests I can run here to help track this down, let me know.... > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:44 AM >> To: Phil Issler >> Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net >> Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 >> >> I (and others) have been able to reproduce this on our own, but >> I'm still not sure what the problem is. >> >> Suspects are: >> * GNU make VPATH issue (in the makefiles or make itself) >> * C:/ vs. /cygdrive/c path issue >> * buggy find.exe? (Not sure why this would cause this problem) >> * something related to OUTPUTDIR and the short paths >> >> Just so people know, it is being investigated, just proving tricky >> to isolate. >> >> -kto >> >> Phil Issler wrote: >>> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. >>> >>> corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the >> following >>> during the build of jdk: >>> >>> >>> C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d >>> "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" - >> d >>> "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d >>> "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d >>> "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D >>> "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" >>> - >> Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g >> O/hpi.res >>> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc >>> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : warning >>> RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' >>> make[6]: *** No rule to make target >>> >> `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO >> /linker_md.obj', >>> needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 >>> /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. >> Stop. >>> make[6]: Leaving directory >>> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' >>> make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 >>> make[5]: Leaving directory >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' >>> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 >>> make[4]: Leaving directory >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' >>> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 >>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' >>> make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 >>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' >>> make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' >>> make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 >>> >>> Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. >>> >>> Phil Issler >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: >> 2/27/2008 4:34 PM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: 2/27/2008 > 4:34 PM > > From ted at tedneward.com Thu Feb 28 04:38:50 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:38:50 -0800 Subject: Problem building b24 on Win32 In-Reply-To: <47C5E0E5.4040003@sun.com> References: <15249930.post@talk.nabble.com> <47C5BD7D.1070202@sun.com> <064e01c87988$fb79dd40$f26d97c0$@com> <47C5E0E5.4040003@sun.com> Message-ID: <08e701c87a06$e1400200$a3c00600$@com> The fix *does* manage to let me build from the top-level successfully, however it doesn't recognize my choice of ALT_OUTPUT_DIR at all; everything still goes into jdk7/build. (I can live with that, for now.) I have the 4.7M fastdebug.log build output capture, if you want to see it, but glancing through it at some of the make invocations, it seems that the ALT_OUTPUT_DIR variable isn't being passed around successfully to the various sub-makes. Still, now I can at least show building a complete JDK top-to-bottom. Thanks, Kelly (and Dave and Tim)! Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM] > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 2:15 PM > To: Ted Neward > Cc: 'Phil Issler'; build-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 > > I'm trying this fix in the top level repository: > > bonsai<315> hg diff > diff --git a/make/Defs-internal.gmk b/make/Defs-internal.gmk > --- a/make/Defs-internal.gmk > +++ b/make/Defs-internal.gmk > @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ endif > > # Common make arguments (supplied to all component builds) > COMMON_BUILD_ARGUMENTS = \ > - JDK_TOPDIR=$(ABS_JDK_TOPDIR) \ > JDK_MAKE_SHARED_DIR=$(ABS_JDK_TOPDIR)/make/common/shared \ > EXTERNALSANITYCONTROL=true \ > TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=$(TARGET_CLASS_VERSION) \ > > Just delete that one line. > > My builds haven't finished yet so I don't know for sure this > fixes the problem. > > -kto > > Ted Neward wrote: > > If there's any tests I can run here to help track this down, let me > know.... > > > > Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev- > >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:44 AM > >> To: Phil Issler > >> Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net > >> Subject: Re: Problem building b24 on Win32 > >> > >> I (and others) have been able to reproduce this on our own, but > >> I'm still not sure what the problem is. > >> > >> Suspects are: > >> * GNU make VPATH issue (in the makefiles or make itself) > >> * C:/ vs. /cygdrive/c path issue > >> * buggy find.exe? (Not sure why this would cause this problem) > >> * something related to OUTPUTDIR and the short paths > >> > >> Just so people know, it is being investigated, just proving tricky > >> to isolate. > >> > >> -kto > >> > >> Phil Issler wrote: > >>> I'm getting an error during a fastdebug_build of OpenJDK b24. > >>> > >>> corba, jaxb, jaxws, hotspot all build OK, then I receive the > >> following > >>> during the build of jdk: > >>> > >>> > >>> C:/Prg/MSVS2003/Common7/Tools/../../Vc7/Bin/rc /l 0x409 /r -d > >>> "J2SE_BUILD_ID=1.7.0-internal-fastdebug-Phil_02_feb_2008_15_31-b00" > - > >> d > >>> "J2SE_COMPANY=" -d "J2SE_COMPONENT=OpenJDK Platform SE binary" -d > >>> "J2SE_VER=7.0.0.0" -d "J2SE_COPYRIGHT=Copyright \xA9 2007" -d > >>> "J2SE_NAME=OpenJDK Platform SE 7 " -d "J2SE_FVER=7,0,0,0" /D > >>> "J2SE_FNAME=hpi.dll" /D "J2SE_INTERNAL_NAME=hpi" /D > "J2SE_FTYPE=0x2L" > >>> - > >> > Foc:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_g > >> O/hpi.res > >>> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc > >>> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc(58) : > warning > >>> RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR' > >>> make[6]: *** No rule to make target > >>> > >> > `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO > >> /linker_md.obj', > >>> needed by `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7 > >>> > /build/WINDOW~2/tmp/java/hpi/windows_threads/obj_gO/.files_compiled'. > >> Stop. > >>> make[6]: Leaving directory > >>> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windows' > >>> make[5]: *** [all] Error 1 > >>> make[5]: Leaving directory > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > >>> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 > >>> make[4]: Leaving directory > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java' > >>> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 > >>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make' > >>> make[2]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 > >>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > >>> make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2 > >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7' > >>> make: *** [fastdebug_build] Error 2 > >>> > >>> Not sure what to try at this point. Any suggestions welcome. > >>> > >>> Phil Issler > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: > >> 2/27/2008 4:34 PM > >> > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: > 2/27/2008 > > 4:34 PM > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: > 2/27/2008 4:34 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1302 - Release Date: 2/27/2008 4:34 PM From ted at tedneward.com Fri Feb 29 07:08:12 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:08:12 -0800 Subject: Is 'optimized' a legit target? Message-ID: <025e01c87ae4$e99bc090$bcd341b0$@com> Using b24 sources, tried to do a ?make all_product all_fastdebug all_debug all_optimized? and the optimized target failed: make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/make' rm -f /cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/build/windows/export-windows-i586/opt imized/jre/bin/server/Xusage.txt.temp sed 's/\(separated by \)[;:]/\1;/g' /cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/src/sha re/vm/Xusage.txt > /cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/build/windows/export-win dows-i586/optimized/jre/bin/server/Xusage.txt.temp mv /cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/build/windows/export-windows-i586/optim i zed/jre/bin/server/Xusage.txt.temp /cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/build/wi ndows/export-windows-i586/optimized/jre/bin/server/Xusage.txt make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/build/ windows/export-windows-i586/optimized/jre/bin/server/jvm.dll', needed by `generi c_export'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/hotspot/make' make: *** [export_optimized] Error 2 I?d not heard of ?optimized? before, which was why I was trying to build it?it shows up in ?make help?. Is it a legit target? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1303 - Release Date: 2/28/2008 12:14 PM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080229/113f5fb6/attachment.html From lists at intricatesoftware.com Fri Feb 29 09:25:29 2008 From: lists at intricatesoftware.com (Kurt Miller) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:25:29 -0500 Subject: corba Makefile bugs (b24) Message-ID: <200802291225.29349.lists@intricatesoftware.com> While working on OpenJDK 1.7 BSD porting efforts, I noticed not all of the corba source was being compiled which caused failures later in the build. It appears to be the result of some typos in a corba Makefile: --- corba/make/org/omg/CORBA/Makefile.orig Sat Dec 1 00:00:00 2007 +++ corba/make/org/omg/CORBA/Makefile Thu Feb 28 15:22:56 2008 @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ else endif FILES_java = \ - $(ORG_OMG_SENDINGCONTEXT_java) \ - $(ORG_OMG_CORBA_2_3_java) \ + $(org_omg_SendingContext_java) \ + $(org_omg_CORBA_2_3_java) \ $(ORG_OMG_CORBA_java) # In addition when I get to the end of the jdk build during the initial-image-jdk target in jdk/make/common/Release.gmk, I'm hitting failures while executing this command: $(JAVAC_CMD) -XDprocess.packages -proc:only \ -processor com.sun.tools.javac.sym.CreateSymbols \ -Acom.sun.tools.javac.sym.Jar=$(RT_JAR) \ -Acom.sun.tools.javac.sym.Dest=$(OUTPUTDIR)/symbols/META-INF/sym/rt.jar \ $(CORE_PKGS) $(NON_CORE_PKGS) $(EXCLUDE_PROPWARN_PKGS) It appears some corba source files are not getting compiled. I have patched some Makefiles to get them to compile but I'm unsure about which corba Makefile to patch to build corba/src/share/classes/com/sun/corba/se/org/omg/CORBA/ORB.java Here's what the current failure looks like: /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx736m -Xms128m -XX:PermSize=32m -XX:MaxPermSize=96m "-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/dist/bootstrap/lib/javac.jar" -jar /usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/dist/bootstrap/lib/javac.jar -source 1.5 -target 5 -encoding ascii "-Xbootclasspath:/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/classes" -XDprocess.packages -proc:only \ -processor com.sun.tools.javac.sym.CreateSymbols \ -Acom.sun.tools.javac.sym.Jar=/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/tmp/rt-orig.jar \ -Acom.sun.tools.javac.sym.Dest=/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/symbols/META-INF/sym/rt.jar \ java.applet java.awt java.awt.color java.awt.datatransfer java.awt.dnd [snip] org.omg.CORBA org.omg.CORBA.DynAnyPackage org.omg.CORBA.ORBPackage org.omg.CORBA.TypeCodePackage org.omg.stub.java.rmi org.omg.CORBA.portable org.omg.CORBA_2_3 org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable org.omg.CosNaming [snip] warning: package javax.transaction does not exist warning: package com.sun.java.swing.plaf does not exist Using boot class path = [/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/tmp/rt-orig.jar, /usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/dist/bootstrap/lib/javac.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/resources.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/sunrsasign.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/jce.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/charsets.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/classes, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/ext/dnsns.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/ext/sunjce_provider.jar, /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/ext/sunpkcs11.jar] error: com.sun.corba.se.org.omg.CORBA.ORB: class file for com.sun.corba.se.org.omg.CORBA.ORB not found error: class file for com.sun.corba.se.org.omg.CORBA.ORB not found 1 error gmake[1]: *** [initial-image-jdk] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/amd64/ports/jdk-1.7.0.b24/openjdk7-b24/jdk/make' gmake: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 The following are the patches I have so far for other missing files. Any help on wether or not I'm on the right track or not would be helpful. If I'm on the right track then a pointer as to how to get corba/src/share/classes/com/sun/corba/se/org/omg/CORBA/ORB.java built properly would be great. Thanks, -Kurt --- corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_dynamicany.jmk.orig Fri Feb 29 00:05:48 2008 +++ corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_dynamicany.jmk Fri Feb 29 00:06:28 2008 @@ -41,4 +41,6 @@ com_sun_corba_se_impl_dynamicany_java = \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynSequenceImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynStructImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynUnionImpl.java \ - com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynValueImpl.java + com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynValueImpl.java \ + com/sun/corba/se/impl/dynamicany/DynValueCommonImpl.java + --- corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_ior.jmk.orig Fri Feb 29 08:58:24 2008 +++ corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_ior.jmk Fri Feb 29 08:58:45 2008 @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ com_sun_corba_se_impl_ior_java = \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/IIOPProfileImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/IIOPProfileTemplateImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/JavaCodebaseComponentImpl.java \ + com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/JavaSerializationComponent.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/MaxStreamFormatVersionComponentImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/RequestPartitioningComponentImpl.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/ior/iiop/ORBTypeComponentImpl.java --- corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_protocol.jmk.orig Thu Feb 28 17:17:49 2008 +++ corba/make/com/sun/corba/minclude/com_sun_corba_se_impl_protocol.jmk Thu Feb 28 17:18:22 2008 @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ com_sun_corba_se_impl_protocol_java = \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/LocateRequestMessage_1_0.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/LocateRequestMessage_1_1.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/LocateRequestMessage_1_2.java \ + com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/LocateReplyOrReplyMessage.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/Message.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/MessageBase.java \ com/sun/corba/se/impl/protocol/giopmsgheaders/MessageHandler.java \ From ted at tedneward.com Fri Feb 29 10:12:26 2008 From: ted at tedneward.com (Ted Neward) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:12:26 -0800 Subject: Very quick question Message-ID: <02aa01c87afe$a609a170$f21ce450$@com> What?s the flag I use to get a list of all the various ?XX flags supported by a VM again? I can?t find it in my email archives now (grrr). Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1304 - Release Date: 2/29/2008 8:18 AM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20080229/95cc5b9d/attachment.html From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Fri Feb 29 10:40:09 2008 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:40:09 -0800 Subject: Very quick question In-Reply-To: <02aa01c87afe$a609a170$f21ce450$@com> References: <02aa01c87afe$a609a170$f21ce450$@com> Message-ID: <47C85189.1070204@sun.com> Ted Neward wrote: > What?s the flag I use to get a list of all the various ?XX flags > supported by a VM again? I can?t find it in my email archives now (grrr). In a fastdebug build, use -Xprintflags Reference lines 1869 through 1874 of this file: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/file/a61af66fc99e/src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2007-June/000051.html http://blogs.sun.com/watt/resource/jvm-options-list.html HTH - Tim From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:36:36 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:36:36 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053636.AB1AE26DC3@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 0a5c5386a678 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/0a5c5386a678 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset cfeea66a3fa8 + .hgtags Changeset: c57bef8dda9c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/c57bef8dda9c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:36:41 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:36:41 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053644.1383426DCA@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 474c23b174e9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/474c23b174e9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 55540e827aef + .hgtags Changeset: fec639c69db2 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/fec639c69db2 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:37:01 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:37:01 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/hotspot: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053706.97A4F26DD1@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 92489cdc94d1 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/92489cdc94d1 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset a61af66fc99e + .hgtags Changeset: 7836be3e92d0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/7836be3e92d0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:37:50 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:37:50 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053754.52C0C26DD8@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9e3c1ad7cdb9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxp/rev/9e3c1ad7cdb9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 6ce5f4757bde + .hgtags Changeset: 49a4bc7b0aa0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxp/rev/49a4bc7b0aa0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:37:59 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:37:59 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053803.9A83226DDF@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7d53d3bd7879 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/7d53d3bd7879 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 0961a4a21176 + .hgtags Changeset: 018781e80410 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/018781e80410 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:38:10 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:38:10 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/jdk: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301053846.6B99426DE6@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 99a06bc7fdb5 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/99a06bc7fdb5 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 37a05a11f281 + .hgtags Changeset: 8266cb7549d3 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/8266cb7549d3 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:40:37 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:40:37 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/build/langtools: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054042.02D8026DED@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: e4dae1993f8b Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/e4dae1993f8b Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 9a66ca7c79fa + .hgtags Changeset: e5e9fa6fa29c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/e5e9fa6fa29c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:42:01 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:42:01 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054201.3C1C926DF4@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 0a5c5386a678 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/rev/0a5c5386a678 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset cfeea66a3fa8 + .hgtags Changeset: c57bef8dda9c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/rev/c57bef8dda9c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:42:06 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:42:06 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054208.6C98626DFB@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 474c23b174e9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/corba/rev/474c23b174e9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 55540e827aef + .hgtags Changeset: fec639c69db2 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/corba/rev/fec639c69db2 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:42:25 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:42:25 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/hotspot: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054231.4E3FD26E02@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 92489cdc94d1 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/hotspot/rev/92489cdc94d1 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset a61af66fc99e + .hgtags Changeset: 7836be3e92d0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/hotspot/rev/7836be3e92d0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:43:10 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:43:10 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054314.0304826E09@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9e3c1ad7cdb9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jaxp/rev/9e3c1ad7cdb9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 6ce5f4757bde + .hgtags Changeset: 49a4bc7b0aa0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jaxp/rev/49a4bc7b0aa0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:43:19 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:43:19 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054323.5CAE026E10@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7d53d3bd7879 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jaxws/rev/7d53d3bd7879 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 0961a4a21176 + .hgtags Changeset: 018781e80410 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jaxws/rev/018781e80410 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:43:30 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:43:30 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/jdk: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054405.DEC4626E17@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 99a06bc7fdb5 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jdk/rev/99a06bc7fdb5 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 37a05a11f281 + .hgtags Changeset: 8266cb7549d3 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/jdk/rev/8266cb7549d3 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 21:45:41 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:45:41 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/corba/langtools: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301054545.81F7E26E1E@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: e4dae1993f8b Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/langtools/rev/e4dae1993f8b Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 9a66ca7c79fa + .hgtags Changeset: e5e9fa6fa29c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/corba/langtools/rev/e5e9fa6fa29c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:18:59 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:18:59 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301061859.344D126F68@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 0a5c5386a678 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/rev/0a5c5386a678 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset cfeea66a3fa8 + .hgtags Changeset: c57bef8dda9c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/rev/c57bef8dda9c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:19:09 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:19:09 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301061912.5238C26F6F@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 474c23b174e9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/corba/rev/474c23b174e9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 55540e827aef + .hgtags Changeset: fec639c69db2 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/corba/rev/fec639c69db2 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:19:35 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:19:35 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/hotspot: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301061940.DDE3F26F76@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 92489cdc94d1 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/hotspot/rev/92489cdc94d1 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset a61af66fc99e + .hgtags Changeset: 7836be3e92d0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/hotspot/rev/7836be3e92d0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:20:24 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:20:24 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062028.D3C1726F7D@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9e3c1ad7cdb9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jaxp/rev/9e3c1ad7cdb9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 6ce5f4757bde + .hgtags Changeset: 49a4bc7b0aa0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jaxp/rev/49a4bc7b0aa0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:20:40 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:20:40 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062044.8DD0326F84@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7d53d3bd7879 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jaxws/rev/7d53d3bd7879 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 0961a4a21176 + .hgtags Changeset: 018781e80410 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jaxws/rev/018781e80410 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:20:57 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:20:57 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/jdk: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062131.979CE26F8B@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 99a06bc7fdb5 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jdk/rev/99a06bc7fdb5 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 37a05a11f281 + .hgtags Changeset: 8266cb7549d3 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/jdk/rev/8266cb7549d3 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:23:21 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:23:21 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxp/langtools: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062326.16ABB26F92@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: e4dae1993f8b Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/langtools/rev/e4dae1993f8b Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 9a66ca7c79fa + .hgtags Changeset: e5e9fa6fa29c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxp/langtools/rev/e5e9fa6fa29c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:24:42 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:24:42 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062442.236D126F99@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 0a5c5386a678 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/rev/0a5c5386a678 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset cfeea66a3fa8 + .hgtags Changeset: c57bef8dda9c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/rev/c57bef8dda9c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:24:53 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:24:53 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062455.7E97726FA0@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 474c23b174e9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/corba/rev/474c23b174e9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 55540e827aef + .hgtags Changeset: fec639c69db2 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/corba/rev/fec639c69db2 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:25:20 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:25:20 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/hotspot: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062526.EFE1E26FA7@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 92489cdc94d1 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/hotspot/rev/92489cdc94d1 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset a61af66fc99e + .hgtags Changeset: 7836be3e92d0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/hotspot/rev/7836be3e92d0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:26:09 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:26:09 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062613.BBF6A26FAE@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9e3c1ad7cdb9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jaxp/rev/9e3c1ad7cdb9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 6ce5f4757bde + .hgtags Changeset: 49a4bc7b0aa0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jaxp/rev/49a4bc7b0aa0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:26:26 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:26:26 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062630.0955C26FB5@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7d53d3bd7879 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jaxws/rev/7d53d3bd7879 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 0961a4a21176 + .hgtags Changeset: 018781e80410 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jaxws/rev/018781e80410 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:26:41 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:26:41 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/jdk: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062719.51C0E26FBC@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 99a06bc7fdb5 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jdk/rev/99a06bc7fdb5 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 37a05a11f281 + .hgtags Changeset: 8266cb7549d3 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/jdk/rev/8266cb7549d3 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:29:01 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:29:01 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/jaxws/langtools: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301062906.31EE526FC3@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: e4dae1993f8b Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/langtools/rev/e4dae1993f8b Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 9a66ca7c79fa + .hgtags Changeset: e5e9fa6fa29c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jaxws/langtools/rev/e5e9fa6fa29c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:37:43 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:37:43 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301063744.007392601F@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 0a5c5386a678 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/rev/0a5c5386a678 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset cfeea66a3fa8 + .hgtags Changeset: c57bef8dda9c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/rev/c57bef8dda9c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:37:55 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:37:55 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/corba: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301063758.6607726029@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 474c23b174e9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/corba/rev/474c23b174e9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 55540e827aef + .hgtags Changeset: fec639c69db2 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/corba/rev/fec639c69db2 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:38:21 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:38:21 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/hotspot: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301063827.C90B126030@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 92489cdc94d1 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/hotspot/rev/92489cdc94d1 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset a61af66fc99e + .hgtags Changeset: 7836be3e92d0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/hotspot/rev/7836be3e92d0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:39:13 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:39:13 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/jaxp: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301063917.8CF9B26037@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9e3c1ad7cdb9 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jaxp/rev/9e3c1ad7cdb9 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 6ce5f4757bde + .hgtags Changeset: 49a4bc7b0aa0 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jaxp/rev/49a4bc7b0aa0 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:39:30 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:39:30 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/jaxws: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301063934.7F2C22603E@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7d53d3bd7879 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jaxws/rev/7d53d3bd7879 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 0961a4a21176 + .hgtags Changeset: 018781e80410 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:03 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jaxws/rev/018781e80410 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:39:47 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:39:47 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/jdk: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301064024.BE1FF26045@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 99a06bc7fdb5 Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jdk/rev/99a06bc7fdb5 Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 37a05a11f281 + .hgtags Changeset: 8266cb7549d3 Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/jdk/rev/8266cb7549d3 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf From mr at sun.com Fri Feb 29 22:42:14 2008 From: mr at sun.com (mr at sun.com) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:42:14 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk7/l10n/langtools: 2 new changesets Message-ID: <20080301064218.477232604E@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: e4dae1993f8b Author: xdono Date: 2007-12-04 16:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/langtools/rev/e4dae1993f8b Added tag jdk7-b24 for changeset 9a66ca7c79fa + .hgtags Changeset: e5e9fa6fa29c Author: mr Date: 2008-02-29 20:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/l10n/langtools/rev/e5e9fa6fa29c 6669216: Add jcheck configuration directories Reviewed-by: ohair, xdono + .jcheck/conf