Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional
Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM
Sat May 16 06:50:27 PDT 2009
Is it not possible to detect that mq is in use/"active" and just bail on
jcheck altogether? i.e. jcheck should surely not apply if you're just
commiting a patch into your local set of mq patches.
On May 15, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
> I've patched my local jcheck a little to work with mq:
> 1. If "Reviewed-by" is "nobody", accept it
> 2. Do not use "self.repo.tags()", bit directly read from the .hgtags
> On May 16, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Mark Reinhold wrote:
>>> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:08:39 -0700
>>> From: jonathan.gibbons at sun.com
>>> What is your experience with the combination of mq and jcheck?
>> None, so far, since jcheck is disabled in the Jigsaw forest.
>>> I like having jcheck enabled as a preextension hook, but that
>>> didn't work well with mq.
>> Hmm, that bug might get fixed now that the jcheck maintainer
>> is heavily using mq.
>> - Mark
More information about the build-dev