Alternative syntax for closures
neal at gafter.com
Mon Jul 7 08:22:29 PDT 2008
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> I've just written a blog about an alternative syntax:
That's nice, but it doesn't really help evaluate this alternative.
If your proposal, I see you use, but don't define, the syntax for function
types. I see you allow referring to a method by its simple name as a
closure, but I don't know what name lookup rules you have in mind that would
make that possible.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the closures-dev