Alternative syntax for closures

Neal Gafter neal at
Mon Jul 7 08:22:29 PDT 2008

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Rémi Forax <forax at> wrote:

> I've just written a blog about an alternative syntax:

That's nice, but it doesn't really help evaluate this alternative.

If your proposal, I see you use, but don't define, the syntax for function
types. I see you allow referring to a method by its simple name as a
closure, but I don't know what name lookup rules you have in mind that would
make that possible.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the closures-dev mailing list