Alternative syntax for closures
neal at gafter.com
Tue Jul 8 06:58:04 PDT 2008
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> Furthermore, i don't like exception type parameter, too complex too, that
> why i've proposed
> a different syntax for method that takes an unrestricted closure, this
> allow to
> perform exception transparency seamlessly and avoid create a type for
> unrestricted function type
> (like T... which is only available in method declaration).
I'd love to see the semantic rules that you have in mind to achieve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the closures-dev