Closures for Java (0.6) specification part b
markmahieu at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 15 22:59:01 PST 2009
On 16 Dec 2009, at 03:21, Neal Gafter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Mark Mahieu <markmahieu at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Bit of a long shot this, but is there any value in revisiting the old idea of using a different syntax for yielding a value from a lambda?
> That doesn't work out so well, for reasons discussed in gory detail here: <http://gafter.blogspot.com/2006/08/tennents-correspondence-principle-and.html>.
OK, although I must admit I'm struggling to see how it doesn't also apply to the use of 'return' in statement lambdas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the closures-dev