Control Invocation Syntax++
peter.levart at marand.si
Fri Dec 18 07:01:40 PST 2009
It's interesting to see how same ideas are re-instantiated again and again.
I, for example, was inspired by Neal's comments that "Control Invocation Syntax" in 0.6b is not enough for all problems and the fact that I programmed in Objective-C a long ago...
But I didn't notice the problem about ambiguity at first. This is a no-go without complicating method resolution any further.
On Friday 18 December 2009 15:45:15 Neal Gafter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Stefan Schulz <schulz at the-loom.de> wrote:
> > Coin will not accept new proposals, as Joe lately said again.
> > But you might be interested in a little blog post of mine from some years
> > ago:
> > http://jroller.com/jadda/entry/multipiece_method_names
> I'll second that with my own ancient historical post: <
More information about the closures-dev