transparent lambda

Stefan Schulz schulz at
Tue Dec 29 14:49:48 PST 2009

On 29.12.2009 23:45, Neal Gafter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Stefan Schulz <schulz at
> <mailto:schulz at>> wrote:
>     The example does not define a lambda label conflicting with a normal
>     label. I was refering to the "may return from the enclosing method"
>     using the method's name as label idea.
> I expect if we also allowed breaking from a method, we would not allow a
> lambda label to conflict with the enclosing method's name.

In the example the conflict is a "normal" label having the same name as 
the enclosing method, which, by now, is legal in Java. The question is, 
whether break within a lambda may refer to a "normal" label.


More information about the closures-dev mailing list