Boxing function types
neal at gafter.com
Sun Nov 29 16:01:46 PST 2009
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:
> I'd love to hear you expand on this. I can't imagine what you might want
> to change in the core language's exception checking rules. I've done some
> language design to support asynchrony, and it transposes to Java very nicely
> assuming you have support for disjunctive types (exception transparency).
Regarding the async language support I've been working on, see the video
http://microsoftpdc.com/Sessions/FT11 from about 40:05 to 52:00. This is
asynchrony in the coroutine sense, which I suspect is not what you have in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the closures-dev