Syntax patterns: more more statistics.
rssh at gradsoft.com.ua
Mon Apr 27 09:23:51 PDT 2009
> The "widening operator (syntax)" check is not really helpful for the
> conversion stuff. The "semantic" one seems to be correct. I suspect the
> one is also picking up a corresponding "encoding" operation corresponding
> to the
> "decoding" operation which is normally being detected by the "semantics"
> (which is why the syntax value is very close to double the number for the
> semantic check). To save processing time, please drop the "syntax" check.
Ok. thanks, will be dropped. (for now to disable possible comment out
lines 214-221 in checkers_coin.def)
Also I forgot to drop old incorrect elvis check. (lines 124-143)
> And thanks very much for all your effort on this.
Thanks for good words. Problems are quite funny to justify scheduled time.
// Interesting that near 50% of my a priory assumptions about
frequency of constructions in Java code was wrong ;)
More information about the coin-dev