Thoughts on unified integer literal improvements
brucechapman at paradise.net.nz
Wed Jul 1 01:49:20 PDT 2009
Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> I don't think Artur's issues are particularly tough nuts to crack (in
> that they have an easy and obvious right answer - see end of this
> post), but I do have some rather serious reservations about this byte
> array literal syntax:
Don't sweat it, a new byte array literal syntax is not being considered
under project coin.
> Seriously - where does it end?
before it starts.
More information about the coin-dev