PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals
r.spilker at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 09:29:52 PDT 2009
Oh yes, you're right.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jesse Wilson <jesse at swank.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Roel Spilker <r.spilker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Secondly, the proposal only allows Field and Method literals that are
>> visible to the caller. But my experience is that I use reflection often to
>> access private members of other classes. So more false positives in the
>> search results.
> No, non-visible members aren't included in these search results.
> Class.getMethod() returns only public methods.
More information about the coin-dev