Notes on implementing concise calls to constructors with type parameters
neal at gafter.com
Thu May 14 16:11:51 PDT 2009
This cannot be an error unless the Java Language Specification requires it
to be an error. The language specification does not currently require it to
be an error. I have no idea what change you are proposing to the
specification that would result in it being an error. Without knowing that,
I cannot evaluate your proposal.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 15.05.2009 00:56, Neal Gafter schrieb:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de <mailto:
>> Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de>> wrote:
>> So no functionality would break, if this accordingly would be
>> upgraded in the Java Language Specification?
>> I have no way to tell without knowing what specification change you have
>> in mind.
> I mean, to determine
> Cell<String> cs = new Cell(1); //unchecked warning
> as error from compiler side.
> My guess is, that this problem could be managed by javac option "-source
> 1.7", to remain compatible, but I'm not sure if there are some reasons
> against this.
More information about the coin-dev