PRE-PROPOSAL: Simple operator overloading.
rssh at gradsoft.com.ua
Fri May 15 21:17:34 PDT 2009
> Catching up on responses, while adding operators for numerical types
> would certainly improve the readability of numerical code using
> non-primitive types, for Project Coin and JDK 7, I think efforts in this
> area should focus on getting  and = for collection-like types since
> they are much more often used than numerical types in Java programming.
It's vicious circle: numerical types does not usable without operator
overloading; operator overloading does not accepted because numerical
types are not used ;)
Are exists some plans (or some way for third party to get project
sponsorship from compiler group) to submit operator overloading JSR for
Java 8 ?
(based not on annotations, but on JSR292 names, to be compatible
with John Rose approach for mlvm:
More information about the coin-dev