Huston, we have a problem !
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Fri Feb 18 08:55:43 PST 2011
On 18/02/11 15:46, "Zdeněk Troníček" wrote:
> Maurizio, this is not good example because the first call is not correct
> here. So, if it does not compile it should not be wrong even if it
> compiled under previous version.
What is wrong about the following code?
Foo f1 = new Foo(1).get("");
> And hopefully you do not want to drive the language design by a
> requirement to be source compatible with sources which are apparently
More information about the coin-dev