Huston, we have a problem !
tronicek at fit.cvut.cz
Fri Feb 18 10:08:38 PST 2011
As far as I understood the original question, it was as follows: Why we
need to write
List<Integer> p = new ArrayList<>();
and not only
List<Integer> p = new ArrayList(); ?
Is there any special reason for <>?
FIT CTU in Prague
Maurizio Cimadamore napsal(a):
> On 18/02/11 17:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Maurizio Cimadamore:
>>>> But are these concepts actually different? If they are, there has to
>>>> be case where adding<> to a raw type results in different results at
>>> Well, because of type-erasure you won't be able to tell the difference
>>> between List<String> and List<Integer> either - so are they the same
>> Clearly, those a different at compile time. What I'm looking for is a
>> case where both Foo and Foo<> result in legal expressions at compile
>> time and produce different byte code.
> As I've shown with my example, Foo and Foo<> are different at
> compile-time. Just as List<String> and List<Integer> are (well, in a
> more subtle way). They have different members, different supertypes etc.
> They are just different types.
More information about the coin-dev