<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/3/17 7:49 PM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+kOe08sVCWwR_khoX7NLEbeYQPw37oqrSDt4XgP8nsuwVfWdA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>---</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Yes, "striped" is a much better name than
"altrows". Â "striped-tables" as you suggest may be better.Â
Choose your names carefully - we can't change them in the
future.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">---</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Well, we can, ... but ...<br>
<br>
A goal of creating specification(s) for the stylesheet(s) provided
by javadoc, for the doclet-generated output, and for the doc-comment
content, is that the specification(s) should be subject to
specification review[1], and not just an impl detail of the javadool
tool and/or build system.<br>
<br>
-- Jon<br>
<br>
[1]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/csr-discuss/2017-April/thread.html">http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/csr-discuss/2017-April/thread.html</a><br>
</body>
</html>