Maintenance Reviews was: [PATCH] Enhance ServiceLoader to understand factory methods
jaroslav.tulach at sun.com
Fri Oct 17 05:28:36 PDT 2008
Thanks for the clarification, Mark. I've heard about some umbrella JSR for
each release of the JDK before and I was hoping that my proposed change
could be covered as part of it. Thanks for confirming that such aggregation
> With regard to this particular proposal, as the original author of ...
OK, I can promise that I will work hard on polishing my proposal. I can
improve the code, I can add more documentation, I can write more tests,
change the new API semantics, etc. I just need a sponsor to tell me what to
change and where and then take and apply my final patch.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Dne Friday 17 October 2008 06:24:13 Mark Reinhold napsal(a):
> > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:56:13 +1000
> > From: david.holmes at sun.com
> > If this is a modification to the API not just a patch for the
> > implementation then the short answer is No.
> Well, not exactly.
> > API changes have to be made
> > via a JSR.
> ... or in a Maintenance Review of an existing JSR.
> Small API revisions and additions do not require their own JSR; that
> would be ridiculously inefficient. Instead we roll them up into a
> series of Maintenance Reviews of the previous Platform JSR .
> There have already been many small API changes in the JDK 7 codebase.
> Suggested patches for further such changes are welcome, and will be
> discussed and judged on their own technical merit. All implemented
> changes will, in due course, be aggregated into an appropriate JCP
> Maintenance Review.
> With regard to this particular proposal, as the original author of
> the class in question I suppose I should have an opinion about it,
> but that's a topic for a different message.
> - Mark
More information about the core-libs-dev