Code review request for 4891262 "API spec, javax/accessibility: few invalid javadoc tags"
Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Thu Dec 10 13:58:01 PST 2009
2009/12/10 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/12/10 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>> While doing a coredocs build, I noticed once again some javadoc warnings
>>> coming out of the javax.accessibility package and I decided to fix them;
>>> patch is below and the full webrev is at
>> Again, good to see these being fixed. What do you think to the idea
>> of backporting these fixes to OpenJDK6 for the next release (b19)?
>> It's not a major issue, but would improve the documentation packages
>> being installed by GNU/Linux distros.
> Andrew, if you wish, you have my approval to apply the fix for 4891262 (just
> pushed into JDK 7 TL) and also
> 6909070 "Missing package statements in java.text.Bidi @see links"
> to OpenJDK 6 build 18, the current build.
Thanks. I'll do that once I get the current timezone patch off my
stack. I suggest we leave a full blitz of such warnings until b19
though, otherwise b18 has the potential to go on for ever :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the core-libs-dev