Request for review: 6799689
Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Thu Feb 26 02:08:34 UTC 2009
Looks fine; approved.
On 02/25/09 06:00 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Thanks. Josh.
> I considered the lazy initialization holder class idiom (thanks to
> your Effective Java book and Brian's Java Concurrency in Practice
> book). I discussed with Joe Darcy about the performance of
> parseHexString. Since it's not a hot method, I decided to go with the
> simple approach making it a synchronized method as a tradeoff of
> adding one additional class.
> On 02/25/09 17:50, Joshua Bloch wrote:
>> Hi! Looks good, but if you care about the performance of
>> parseHexString, you might want to use the "lazy initialization holder
>> class idiom" (Effective Java 2e, Page 283). I can't promise that
>> you'll be able to measure the difference, or that it will be faster,
>> but I suspect so.
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Mandy Chung <Mandy.Chung at sun.com
>> <mailto:Mandy.Chung at sun.com>> wrote:
>> 6799689 Make sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.hexFloatPattern static field
>> initialized lazily
>> The Pattern object is not always needed but is currently
>> instantiated in the static initializer. Lazy initialization of the
>> hexFloatFattern static field will save the regex classes not to be
>> loaded until it's needed.
More information about the core-libs-dev