execvpe and glibc 2.10
Michael.McMahon at Sun.COM
Tue Jul 28 12:43:55 UTC 2009
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/7/9 Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com>:
>> Sorry, I should never have named a function (not even a static one)
>> 'execvpe'. It's amusing that I broke myself by requesting that glibc
>> implement 'execvpe'.
>> Here's the webrev:
>> For those following things, there are now 3 pending patches for
>> and there are more to come.
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:32, Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>> I am having trouble building IcedTea6 on Fedora 12
>>> it seems because this bug was fixed in glibc-2.10-3:
>>> Do you have a patch for IcedTea/OpenJDK to get around this?
> What happened to this patch? Has it been pushed to 6/7?
No, it hasn't been pushed yet. The vfork-exec one in particular
needs some more testing before it can be pushed.
More information about the core-libs-dev