Fastpath for new String(bytes...) and String.getBytes(...)
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Fri Mar 20 15:07:35 PDT 2009
Am 20.03.2009 23:17, Xueming Shen schrieb:
> Ulf Zibis wrote:
>> The problem with the dependencies (EUC*, ISO2022*, etc.) from the
>> jis0201 maps I've solved here:
>> So jis0201 can be constructed like all other single-byte charsets.
> nice to see that, so i will try to just take your code when i'm ready
> to work on the db stuff
> (if we can get that copyright stuff right) or you can start work on
> the 7 based openjdk.
I'm working on it. May be this would be my first changeset ...but I
think, I should start with more simple changes e.g.:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6795536 (see my
I assume, you have read my questions regarding build environment
addressed to Alan.
If I get stuck, can I count for some help?
> took a very quick scan, no, i don't think we are going to get all of
> them in in one shoot:-)
Yes, I'm aware of this. I think, I'm able to split my changes into
> (1)don't try PCK and SJIS, they will have to be modified to the map
> based implementation (i have the
> implementation ready somewhere waiting for review), since the existing
> implementation has a
> fundamental flaw, the jis<->sjis algorithm (from the book) has the
> assumption that all input
> bytes are legal jis or sjis...
> (2)anyway reason you do cs.getClass() == XYX.class instead of cs
> instanceof XYZ?
cs instanceof XYZ also includes subclasses of XYZ, but this often is
wrong, subclass of XYZ likely contains different mapping, which is not
equal from XYZ-side of view. Refer:
> (3)some contains() methods do not seem right, they only check sjis0201.
As I said: Charset#contains() should be examined for ALL charsets. :-(
More information about the core-libs-dev