What methods should go into a java.util.Objects class in JDK 7?
mikro2nd at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 08:24:16 UTC 2009
Joe Darcy wrote:
> For JDK 7, I think it is high-time the platform included a class like
> java.util.Objects to hold commonly-written utility methods. For
> What other utility methods would have broad enough use and applicability
> to go into a common java.util class?
Ah! Let's just go back to coding in C, then. I cannot see any
justification for everything and the kitchen-sink being glommed into the
Java APIs. If people want these sort of static methods, they're
pretty-much all available in other libraries (Apache Commons, etc.)
Must they /really/ be added to the morass that the Java APIs have become?
(Sorry: As a non-contributor I probably don't have the mana to make such
a comment, but this proposal really punches a lot of my buttons.)
mike morris :: mikro2nd (at) gmail (dot) com
This email is [X]bloggable [ ]ask-first [ ]private
More information about the core-libs-dev