kevinb at google.com
Tue Mar 30 17:54:17 UTC 2010
Pair is only a partial, flawed solution to a special case (n=2) of a very
significant problem: the disproportionate complexity of creating value types
in Java. I support addressing the underlying problem in Java 8, and not
littering the API with dead-end solutions like Pair.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Weijun Wang <Weijun.Wang at sun.com> wrote:
> Hi All
> There are multiple CRs asking for a java.util.Pair class:
> I know such a simple thing can be made very complex and everyone might want
> to add a new method into it. How about we just make it most primitive?
> Simply an immutable and Serializable class, two final fields, one
> constructor, two getters (?), and no static factory methods. (S)he who does
> the real implementation has the privilege to choose between head/tail and
Kevin Bourrillion @ Google
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the core-libs-dev