Zlib level in JDK7
spoole at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Feb 17 07:15:56 UTC 2011
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 12:53 +0000, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Steve Poole wrote:
> > :
> > I can appreciate why you want to be cautious right now - but it is
> > important that the codebase is regularly upgraded. If IcedTea have shown
> > that 1.2.5 is "ok" then I'd say the risk is quite low.
> > For JDK 8 it would make sense to discuss the pros and cons of relying on
> > the system version of zlib. I can make the case either way though.
> We should probably add a build option around this so there is the option
> of using the system zip library in preference to compiling the zlib copy
> in the repository. However, I don't think we can get away from keeping a
> copy in the repository as we need to be able to compile to platforms
> that don't have zlib.
> Do you have cycles to do testing with zlib 1.2.5, ideally on platforms
> other than Linux? (I suggest platforms other than Linux as it does
> appear that this version is used there and it would really help to get
> confirmation that all is well on other platforms too).
What sort of testing did you have in mind? You mean run the zlib tests
and/or OpenJDK testcases?
More information about the core-libs-dev