Review Request : 7029997 : Restyling of SortedMap Javadoc
mike.duigou at oracle.com
Tue Mar 22 16:33:03 PDT 2011
Thanks for the feedback.
On Mar 22 2011, at 16:12 , Chris Hegarty wrote:
> The changes look good.
> I have two minor comment:
> 1) "ranges.Such" typo, missing space after dot
> 2) "Though nothing enforces this recommendation as interfaces cannot
> declare constructors". I'd tend to move this statement to before
> the list, and maybe put it in parantheses after constructors.
> Also my personal preference is to stay with "there is no way to"
> rather than "nothing". That would look like:
> <p>All general-purpose sorted map implementation classes should
> provide four "standard" constructors (though there is no way to
> enforce this ...):
> This is just my personal preference. I'm ok with your changes as is.
How about this version :
* <p>All general-purpose sorted map implementation classes should provide four
* "standard" constructors. It is not possible to enforce this recommendation
* though as required constructors cannot be specified by interfaces. The
* expected "standard" constructors for all sorted map implementations are:
> On 03/22/11 08:12 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>> Hello all;
>> I have made a couple of styling improvements to the JavaDoc for SortedMap; principally conversion of an inline list to use the HTML<ol> tag. The remainder of the changes are updates to the standard javadoc tags.
More information about the core-libs-dev