Code Review - 6818464 TEST_BUG: Timeout values in several java/util tests are insufficient
david.holmes at oracle.com
Sun Nov 20 17:37:39 PST 2011
<sigh> I see this was already pushed.
On 21/11/2011 10:47 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 19/11/2011 2:46 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
>> I think this change is ready to commit, just need
>> a sponsor for the last push (Mandy/David?).
> As I've said before the reference to tdThread must be volatile as you
> are communicating the value from the timer thread to the main thread. So
> the idiom of using a one-element array instead of a static field is not
> applicable in this case as you can not declare an array with volatile
More information about the core-libs-dev