Request for review - change two include header files according to POSIX.1-2008

Neil Richards neil.richards at
Thu Oct 13 12:22:02 UTC 2011

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:11 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> On 13/10/2011 2:54 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
> > Thanks Alan. Below is the patch I am failed to attach. It is trivial...
> Do you need someone to sponsor this for you, or are you able to drive 
> this via other IBM folk that can generate webrevs on 
> and ultimately do the push?

Hi David,

"As if by magic, the shopkeeper appeared." [1]

For ease of review, I've uploaded the suggested changes onto as two webrevs, one for awt [2], the other for tl

I'll be happy to push the changes, too.

Will there need to be two bug numbers for this: one for awt & one for
tl ?

I'm currently laboring under the (mistaken?) belief that it's easier
(read: swifter) for Oracle folk to drive the mechanics of getting Java
bugs raised for these items than for "outsiders" to do so.

If this is so, could you do this bit of bookkeeping for me, and let me
know the bug numbers / abstracts to slot into changes ?

(Feel free to disabuse me of this belief if you think it is unfounded).



Unless stated above:
IBM email: neil_richards at
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list