jcheck conflict in jdk8/tl/jdk and awt repos: same CR # 7100054 used in two different changesets (one in tl, the other in awt forest)

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Oct 25 10:34:39 UTC 2011

On 25/10/2011 01:21, Lana Steuck wrote:
> To: TL and Awt teams
> What: we have a jcheck conflict in jdk8/tl/jdk and jdk8/awt/jdk repos:
>   same Bugid # 7100054 used in two different changesets (one in 
> tl/jdk, the other in awt/jdk repo)
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/f218e6bdf1e8
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c3da0672a882
> neil.richards at ngmr.net
> 7100054: (porting) Native code should include fcntl.h and unistd.h 
> rather than sys/fcntl.h and sys/unistd.h
> Summary: Use POSIX defined includes for unistd.h and fcntl.h
I think I may be partly to blame here. Neil did ask whether he needed a 
separate CR for the AWT change and I told him ([1]) that one was 
sufficient. I didn't realize he was thinking of splitting the changes 
though as there wasn't any real need to do this for this.



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list