RFR: CR#8004561 : Additional Functional Interfaces and Updates
peter.levart at gmail.com
Fri Dec 21 13:47:28 UTC 2012
I see that (given Function f, g), f.compose(g) means: f⨟g, rather than
f∘g. Would mathematicians complain? :-)
On 12/21/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Hello all;
> Here are some additional functional interfaces for review. The additions fill in holes for primitive types and for two operand "Bi" operations.
> Additionally, this patch contains naming updates on the existing functional interfaces following 335 EG review. It does not include the interface specializations and default methods previously proposed in CR#8004015. That proposal has been withdrawn. It turned out that user errors involving unexpected boxing were just too common for the value provided.
More information about the core-libs-dev