martinrb at google.com
Tue Apr 2 22:29:55 UTC 2013
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Mark Sheppard <mark.sheppard at oracle.com>wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> are there any concerns that the string literal "." might be on the stack
> and not in data segment or heap?
> Also, is it assured that the returned parentPathv will never be
> de-allocated? I don't see parentPathv exposed beyond **
> that of UNIXProcess_md.c, at least not directly.
It is not visible anywhere else. It's "permanently" allocated. Those of
you thinking about shutting down and restarting a JVM within the same
process will cringe - this is one of many "little leaks" in such an
More information about the core-libs-dev