Review Request for JDK-8012937: Correct errors in javadoc comments

Joseph Darcy joe.darcy at
Tue Apr 23 02:09:44 UTC 2013


  240      * Returns the number of formal parameters (whether explicitly
  241      * declared or implicitly declared or neither) for the executable

Are there parameters that are neither explicitly nor implicitly declared?

I still think the follow comment is better deleted given the source that 
follows it:

  157         // If a parameter has no name, return argX, where x is the
  158         // index.
  159         //


On 4/22/2013 11:46 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> I have posted a newer version with some more edits.  Please review and
> suggest any further changes.
> On 04/22/13 12:10, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Please review this simple change, which corrects some errors in the
>> javadoc comments for method parameter reflection.
>> Note that this changeset does not include any code changes.
>> The webrev is here:
>> Also, if you have any additional issues with the javadoc comments,
>> please reply to this request with a description of the problem.
>> Thanks,
>> Eric

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list