RFR 8010325 : Remove hash32() method and hash32 int field from java.lang.String

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Fri Jun 14 20:36:53 UTC 2013

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Brent Christian <
brent.christian at oracle.com> wrote:

> On 6/12/13 7:55 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Something of an aside but ...
>> On 13/06/2013 3:45 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>> Hi Brent,
>>> Thanks for doing this.
>>> Your webrev does not include mercurial changeset information, which I
>>> think
>>> is supported by recent webrevs.
>> Given the changeset has to be created after the review is complete
>> most/many people will not have a changeset prepared at review time.
> That's it exactly.  If at all possible, I don't commit until the code has
> completed code review.  I tell webrev to do its thing based on modified
> files, rather than outgoing changesets.

Hmmm.... I've been using mq for so long it's hard for me to imagine working
without it.

It allows others to review the mercurial changeset metadata, which is also
the best summary to decide whether to review further.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list