RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow
brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Mon Jun 17 18:39:12 UTC 2013
I'll update this but without reposting the webrev until I can upload the HTML version.
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote:
> You're right, it'd be WIDTH - 1, but since most of the comments refer to BITS + 1, that evens out nicely.
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian Burkhalter<brian.burkhalter at oracle.com> wrote:
> Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit?
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote:
> > The comments mention SIGNIFICAND_BITS, which I think should probably be SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH?
More information about the core-libs-dev