RFC: 6178739 - Formatter - Zero padding flag with zero width

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Jun 26 16:37:46 UTC 2013

On 6/25/2013 9:07 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>> "Requires the output to be padded with leading zeros to the minimum field width following any sign or radix indicator except when converting NaN or infinity. If the width is not provided, then a MissingFormatWidthException will be thrown."
>>> Comments?
>> As a point of comparison, how does the C specification of printf and how do C implementations handle this combination?
> To be certain, which combination precisely do you intend?

Specifically, I was referred to how C handles "%0.4f\n".


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list