RFR: 8009428 and 8009429 - Profile related fixes and clean ups
erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Fri Mar 8 11:25:33 UTC 2013
On 2013-03-08 10:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 08/03/2013 01:48, David Holmes wrote:
>> Not sure which is best list for this given Alan will likely be the
>> only reviewer anyway :)
>> Webrevs under:
> As further background to others, the reverting of the $ substitution
> became possible when Nashorn removed $ from its generated classes .
> I've looked through the changes and they look really good to me.
> Putting $< in single quotes to avoid shell expansion is the solution
> that I could not find when adding the de-beaning recipes a few months
> ago. It's great to see PROFILE_4 renamed to FULL_JRE and is also great
> to remove the redundant sub-packages from the include lists. For
> profiles-rtjar-includes then I think it makes it much more readable
> and maintainable. Two minor inconsistencies: the sub-packages of
> javax.naming are listed and com/sun/jndi/ has a trailing slash.
> One probable side effect of removing the redundant sub-packages will
> be the javadoc. The one case to date where we didn't list sub-packages
> is java.time (because there are still changes going on there) and that
> the result is that the sub-packages of java.time don't show up in the
> profiles view. I created 8008367 a few weeks for that and I suspect
> that once these changes are pushed that the profiles view will be very
> incomplete. I don't think this should be a reason to hold off your
> changes as the profiles view isn't right now anyway. Hopefully Bhavesh
> will get to this soon.
> I think Erik should review this too as it's important that the build
> changes in jdk8/tl will merge easily with changes going into jdk8/build.
>  http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/nashorn/rev/fe5211fc3114
Looks good to me and thanks again for cleaning up that $ business. I do
not think this will conflict with anything coming from jdk8/build.
More information about the core-libs-dev