RFR 8014076: Arrays parallel and serial sorting improvements

Chris Hegarty chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Thu May 9 09:47:28 UTC 2013

On 05/09/2013 10:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> ....
>> Good point Mike. I guess the same argument could be made for putting
>> any value in the implementation detail. Any objection to completely
>> removing any reference to this?
> The compile-time constant issue is easily fixed by using an
> initialization function.
> I think it is important for users to know what the sequential sorting
> threshold is.

I don't understand why this is important. Is the general advise not, 
always use parallelSort unless there is a good reason not to?


> David
> -----
>> -Chris
>>> Mike

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list