RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API
iris.clark at oracle.com
Fri May 31 16:52:43 UTC 2013
That's what I remember too. There were just too many objections to completely removing all @author tags.
From: Alan Bateman
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:57 AM
To: Paul Sandoz
Cc: core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net Libs
Subject: Re: RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API
On 31/05/2013 12:26, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> My understanding is the @author tag is no longer something we should
> be using for new JDK code (and to be egalitarian about it perhaps we
> should strip out @author tags from all the code!)
I vaguely remember there was discussion on this topic a few years ago. I think (but might be wrong) that the guideline at the time was not to remove @author from existing code. In this case it is new code and if Jim is okay with it then I don't see any issue removing it.
More information about the core-libs-dev