Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Nov 19 12:29:23 UTC 2013
On 19/11/2013 12:09, Weijun Wang wrote:
> b114: 1
> my (previous) own build: 0
> I fetched changes for JDK-8028321 (the un-do) and now it's back to 1.
> So we are keeping this compatibility even if it does not look correct?
I think it will require careful analysis to see what is possible (as
there were several problems when this was pushed due to a dependency on
the long standing behavior).
More information about the core-libs-dev