RFR: 8024014 & 8024015 : (xs) TEST.groups updates
david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Sep 2 23:23:26 UTC 2013
On 3/09/2013 2:05 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 30/08/2013 21:30, Mike Duigou wrote:
>> Did you see David Holmes' suggestion? Do you think it's adequate? I
>> agree about the maintainability aspect as I really felt guilty
>> re-creating FILES_JAVA.gmk...
> Sorry Mike, I somehow missed your reply on this topic. Do you mean
> reorganizing the tests, say to move the collection tests down a level? I
I think he meant my suggesting on how to define the groups without
needing to list everything that comprises "other".
> don't see a problem with that except that moving tests around can be
> mildly disruptive, bugs tracking test failures for example.
More information about the core-libs-dev