SplittableRandom update

Kasper Nielsen kasperni at gmail.com
Fri Sep 20 15:25:03 UTC 2013


This is minor, but I hate it when bounds check does not include the
specified parameters.
Makes it much harder to track down a bug, if all you have is a stack trace.

- Kasper

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:

> In the course of writing up a report (coming soon) that includes
> discussion of SplittableRandom, we had a chance to further
> analyze and test things, resulting in a few small improvements. Plus
> some internal renamings to better reflect intent.
> Plus now with the same initial seed mechanics
> discussed a few days ago for ThreadLocalRandom.
> Thanks to Paul Sandoz for creating webrevs:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/**browse/JDK-8025136<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025136>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-**
> enhancements/webrev/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-enhancements/webrev/>
> I think we need one more reviewer for it.
> -Doug

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list