jmx-dev <Core Libs Dev> Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management
alexander.v.stepanov at oracle.com
Tue Apr 1 14:41:32 UTC 2014
Please see the updated webrev here:
> I just assume the removal of the </p> isn't really necessary.
Yes, probably. That was done just to make tidy happy.
On 01.04.2014 17:44, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> Looks good.
> I think I would remove the leading <p> in
> as well. If you don't please check that the generated javadoc for
> JMXPrincipal.java still looks good.
> While you're at it maybe you should remove the strange <br>
> between the @param tags in
> such as:
> 86 * <br>
> best regards,
> -- daniel
> On 4/1/14 2:57 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list.
>> On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote:
>>> Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
>>> Webrev corresponding:
>>> Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
More information about the core-libs-dev