Implicit 'this' return for void methods
aph at redhat.com
Wed Apr 2 09:08:02 UTC 2014
On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
> What is the relationship between this "naked dot" proposal and the
> "chaining of void methods" proposal? The reason for asking is not to be
> negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with
> together, or as independent proposals.
> I think that if either of these are going to happen, then they must be
> specified with the appropriate level of isolation: That which belongs
> together must be processed together; that which belongs apart must be
> processed apart.
Point taken, but Project Coin (small language changes) worked well.
More information about the core-libs-dev