RFR (L) 8037210: Get rid of char-based descriptions 'J' of basic types
john.r.rose at oracle.com
Fri Apr 4 04:44:49 UTC 2014
On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There is no type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use different names just because they are used in other namespaces. This is not a C define.
They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types. The letters are signature letters. Can we move on from this?
More information about the core-libs-dev