RFR (L) 8037210: Get rid of char-based descriptions 'J' of basic types
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Fri Apr 4 23:31:53 UTC 2014
On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:44 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There is no type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use different names just because they are used in other namespaces. This is not a C define.
> They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types. The letters are signature letters. Can we move on from this?
Sure. Push it.
> — John
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
More information about the core-libs-dev